/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13138137

130KiB, 800x564, 32614619402_dd5985fb21_c.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Do you still have time?

Anonymous Sun 16 May 01:30:25 2021 No.13138137 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13138345 >>13138443 >>13138458 >>13138588 >>13138905

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 02:15:07 No.13138345 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138137
Weierstrass is one example. Kept publishing at nearly 80.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 02:45:11 No.13138429 Report

Quoted By: >>13138477 >>13138487

What happens is, as people mature they start to become aware of the fact that fucking around with numbers is a complete waste of time, and abandon the field to do something in the real world instead

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 02:49:09 No.13138443 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138137
>backwater farmboy from 1800 dies of tuberculosis in his 20s
>uR nOT goNnA mAke it bRo!!1!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 02:52:06 No.13138458 Report

Quoted By: >>13138545

>>13138137
Kant published his first critique at 58.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 02:56:05 No.13138477 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138429
>Yeah, time to start banging sloots!...
>Oh wait, I'm old.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 02:57:47 No.13138487 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138429
Based

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 03:15:57 No.13138545 Report

Quoted By: >>13138563 >>13139547 >>13139588 >>13139596

>>13138458
Irrelevant work

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 03:18:39 No.13138553 Report

Quoted By:

Dirac published over 60 papers between age 70 and 82.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Kant drawing.jpg, 160KiB, 648x900

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 03:21:26 No.13138563 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138545
Why are scifags like this?

>inb4 Einstein refuted Kant

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 03:27:59 No.13138588 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138137
I was going to disagree until I realised that was maths specific. It could be true there but plenty of scientists have made their greatest contributions after 50.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 05:15:37 No.13138905 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138137
Naive empiricism at its finest.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 09:29:54 No.13139547 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138545
categorically false

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 09:42:27 No.13139588 Report

Quoted By: >>13139869

>>13138545
philosophy is quite relevant to science but I agree that it's not math

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 09:44:50 No.13139596 Report

Quoted By:

>>13138545
>t. smoothbrain

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 10:00:19 No.13139636 Report

Quoted By:

You have to be a literal autist to achieve anything worthwhile in stem

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 May 2021 11:24:38 No.13139869 Report

Quoted By:

>>13139588
In practice it is completely irrelevant. The scientific community at large doesnt care about philosophy though they pay lip service to it.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches