So the current political climate in the us leads to one party attempting to pass laws to restrict emissions on manufacturing and other businesses, but the motivation behind all of these neoglobalist policies seems to be that they benefit large corporations (immigration, global warming laws, censorship). What percentage of Democrat politicians would actually push global warming laws if there was no way for their major donors to benefit? If it wasn't possible for the big companies to just make things in China (where they can be way more destructive to the environment than they ever could in the us), while putting smaller companies who can't afford to in a bad position, would we even see this push in the media for global warming laws?
The neoglobalist mindset seems to be that any propaganda, no matter how destructive, is OK as long as it advances their agenda. I don't see how any of these people legitimately care about global warming, considering how they are unphased by the uncontrollable rising African and (to a much lesser extent) South American populations, or how they are ok with "developing nations" being omitted from these restrictions.

The question I'm trying to ask is, how many people who are actually in power truly care about stopping "global warming"? Because from my perspective it's just neoglobalist propaganda (I'm not arguing the validity of man made global warming, im arguing that it is inconsequential whether it's real or not, because that is NOT a motivating factor for US politicians, especially neoglobalists)