>>13097508>The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test.I have read the Fuellmich transcript, and have accumulated a few RT-PCR medical publications to verifying the above claims.
>100% faulty at 35 cyclesExcept Christian Drossen's 2007 publication directly conflicts with this claim - pic related, PDF also linked below of the paper:
https://jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/45/3/1049.full.pdfCopies and cycles are not the same; the number of copies produced are on the magnitude of 2^(number of cycles). If the 95% detection limit is 35 COPIES according to the paper, that would theoretically only require as few as 5-6 cycles to reach that threshold. Perhaps you are referring to new publications, but you will surely reference and link them directly of that is the case.
I'm not even on the side of the masker nuts, but Jesus, get your argument straight and solid before you make an even greater divide between everyone. Covid got blown out of proportion, and the US taxpayer footed the R&D bill by compulsion and manufactured consent for the benefit of a new flu-adjacent vaccine benefactors (the world) and the white collar medical fuckheads who were blinded by the money bags in their eyes. Masking should have always been voluntary and relied on social/cultural pressure, the law overstepped again, but what's new?
