>>13101196>Vixra author here.I admire your dedication to the truth, do not give up.
>To create a comprehensive theory there is a massive amount of ground that needs to be covered and a huge number of experimental results that need to be re-derived. You are reversing cause and effect, you need a new principle to guide that recanvassing, that happens after your revolution. Look for the keystone (or beam 79) and once you kick it out the structure falls. Nobody is going to do the rework until the flaw is found.
>Realistically, correcting the direction of physics isn't going to be the heroic work of a single person.This is modern BS, there is no collective brain. History is full of heros and one man could identify the false assumptions and integrate QM/GR in a 3-4 page paper once he finds the error. It could be you. The next revolution in physics will come, not from a team, but an individual posting to
vixra.org not
arxiv.org. They admit they are lost (and obviously deaf or deluded), take them at their word.
> Every branch of physics is currently infested with incorrect relativistic thinking.But relativity is true, velocities are relative to an observer (reference frame). Einstein was right about that (not a new idea) so ask yourself what problem SR was trying to solve? He was reconciling Maxwell's equations (EM) and Newtonian dynamics but his fix was a kludge that opened the door to mystics. Nevertheless, he deserves credit because he never capitulated to the QM mystics and became a fossil in his own field by the mid 50's.
> I am planning to embark on a more in-depth study of quantum mechanics... Don't do that, you will wreck your mind. Focus on the forest not the trees.
Hints: What are alternatives Einstein's postulates? What are Newton/Maxwell assumptions? Can you measure speed of light when ALL measurement uses light/EM? When physicists brag that QM results are to 16 decimal places, ask if they are not just measuring their yard sticks.
