>>13081838>You’re saying science is wrong by using scienceno, i'm not, you illiterate. i'm saying science produces errors.
> whole ordeal of science is the possibility of models being replaced by more accurate oneswhich is my point.
>Where as systems based on faith don’t allow this.so you agree that trust the science is a retarded concept. or are you suffering from cognitive dissonance?
>You’re counter argument is the actual counter argument against faith based beliefs.which is exactly what i'm arguing against. "trust the science" is dogmatism that hijacked a process of inquiry.
>Anyway I’m sure your going to weasel around this because you’re either a charlatan or more likely a stupid factory worker.you're just a brainlet. pure and simple.
