>>13063608I understand the analogy. I guess I need to explain OPs argument. It has nothing to do with "being a scientist 100% of the time". If you're a literal expert in a field, and your default position toward such field is to doubt and to conduct experiments, then you're a legitimate fucking idiot to blindly believe on a topic in which you're not even an expert. You apply skepticism to a topic you're comfortable with, all the while blindly accepting on faith a topic you're uncomfortable with. It's actual idiocy.
