>>13059540Logically speaking, you have just proved a negative. Your statement is true, but in being true proves itself false.
Using analogies to compare differing structures in reality is as dumb as comparing apples to oranges, except through a very specific lens which is in this case fruit.
In the end all you have actually done is prove the validity of analogies by proving bad analogies exist, therefore good ones have a very likelyhood of existing too.
