>>13054707>you talk about child like reasoning yet you make false equivalencies like a toddler.The reasoning is absolute trash. If you cannot see the gaps it just means you're stunted.
x & y happend at the same time therefore x causes y is a big retard filter you cannot pass it seems.
>misfolding can result in a number of different outcomes. protein misfolding can result in unwanted gain of function. Yeah with an astronomically low chance. Your cells produce milions of misfolded proteins per hour and we arent dropping like flies anytime soon.
There is no possible gain of function in a spike protein.
>so it may interact with a pathway like a tumor suppressor pathway.0 chance, it cannot even with ''mutations'' enter the nucleus or bind to any proteins on the pathway. Again if youre gonna argue this people should be dropping dead like flies due to other protein mishaps.
>there is a literal furin cleavage site on it that is required for membrane fusion with human ace2.no shit beyond that it does jack, read more.
>thought so. you can't make this claim.t. has secret knowledge of it interacting with other receptors
Cannot prove a negative again back with the logic of a child. Prove to me glucose doesn't inferfere in fad/fadl pathway, I'll be waiting. Can't? thought so glucose inhibts tumor suppression confirmed.
Rest of you post is babble about babbies first encouter with virus entrance. Maybe take a look at HIV and how its entrance proteins arent dangerous either.
Your whole argument is spike protein = dangereous therefore mrna making spike protein dangerous as well. Just ignore that the mrna made spike protein DOESNT leave the cell, nor that it is the damaging part of SARS CoV2
>. it's not till you have the data which we can't till at least a few years.Your asumption is that mRNA will last a few years, or that the production of an INERT protein will cause pathological interactions years after it has degraded.
