>>13028898>Are we going to eventually find ourselves living in arcologiesI believe so, but not
>as we fuck the planet considering the exodus idea is retardedbut as we come to the slow realization that space at scale isn't getting there its sustained logistical sustainment, arcologies make perfect candidates for the advancement of actual space at scale, like the materials advacement necessary to drive the Shimizu Mega-City Pyramid.
I myself am hoping sensible heads drive climate change and acknowledge the futility ad fighting the torrent, but driving adaptation approaches. Thinks like geodesic spans that can acclimatise high arctic cities, like the ones in the 60's.
especially in the monetary paradigm where accelerating money trumps moving money, trumps stationary money trumps debt, etc, the desire to innovate "greenly" as is geopolitically mandatable to turn the gears drives it.
I like to sum it with a catch phrase that life amongst the stars starts here at home. And critique it by saying how can one colonize mars if they cannot colonize Greenland or Antarctica, or even the deep blue fathoms.
Anyways, not to discredit getting they will yield in benefits, but my dollars are looking to earthly things that'll end up among the stars, which I think will be driven by desire for resilience than picking up the pieces of a climatic 'event'.
anyways, I think the political point is stressing the degree of centralization. If these things don't reasonably drive the existing capital structure it wont grease the pockets of housing contractors. Sympathetically production at scale is hardly a smooth curve, if only physical could be as liquid as crypto, but alas...
If in ending you'd like a justification as to why were building grid guzzling skyscrapers instead of geodesic domed arctic community sustaining villages my response it only convenience culture nimbying throughout the political,economic and ideological domain of society
