>>13029421That's the whole fucking point. Classical mechanics seems to describe the world well at macroscopic scales. The theory that describes it seems completely predictable. But at smaller scales quantum mechanics introduces, at least mathematically, inherent randomness. Classical mechanics can be derived from quantum mechanics (in the sense that many random events become normally distributed and the varriance decreases in proportion to the size of the macroscopic parameters) so they don't conflict, The question is, if they don't conflict, does this mean that all physics is random at it's core? Or are there further underlying processes, which are again perfectly predictable, and give rise to a quasi-random seeming quantum mechanics. The answer to this question is unknown, but as of right now there is no candidate theory that can reproduce quantum mechanic's apparent randomness with underlying, predictable physics.
