>>13017205Focusing on what women waste most men's active focus time with (sexual promises and teasing) is far from irrelevant.
>>13016779The awareness and known ease of obtaining these things would achieve:
1. Women reevaluating their money <-> sexual provisioning exchange methods, which would lead to a general price drop and diversification of their offerings.
e.g. As a woman I can't get free dinners and life a financially independent life by deceiving men with weak sexual promises and flirting.
2. With greater access men would be able to experience more with less stress and emotional overhead, allowing them to see what stress in their life can be relieved by what sexual act.
e.g. As a man is my stress or problem solved by jerking off, fucking a willing partner in the ass, or a $20 blowjob at the local McFaceFuck™?
3. The social narrative and conversation would remove a lot of sluggish or outdated relationship approaches that are perpetuated by music/movies/media in general. It would also save a lot of time for the economy because the insipid medium-level titillation that is currently pervasive would lessen and make space for actual creative and unique explorations of expressions that don't need to rely on sex to sell.
4. The ready and cheap availability of companionship would serve a communal and therapeutic purpose for the lonely and detached as service providers could also engage in basic listening/conversation practices.
5. The tax revenue and increase in employment also allows for greater social interaction which leads to a decrease in social disharmony as the stigma of sexuality and sex in general dissolves.
6. People who feel trapped in relationships could gain intimacy perspectives.
7.My mom could finally get satisfied by having sufficient access to the amount of cock she requires in order to stop hunting the local bars for lonely and desperate men.
