>>12997705But if it did, wouldn't things with higher mass seem to be resistant to gravity? Everything falls at the exact same rate, even if they start from the same relative velocity of zero. But to overcome inertia there would have had to be more energy put into the heavier object in order for its velocity to match the lighter object. This makes sense to me because the heavier object hits the ground harder due to F=MA, and the A from gravity is relatively constant near the surface of the earth.
Am I just completely fucking retarded?
