>>12995654I just want to read an actual reproducible scientific study about this stuff. There has never been a conclusive unbiased scientific study about transgenderism that has seen the light of day. Gender studies is a dying field that is the biggest area impacted by the replication crisis, meaning that most of the experiments or studies use false data or were completely fabricated or non-existent and not capable of being independently reproduced by other scientists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisisI also noticed Wikipedia straight-up genuinely lying about transgenderism and using unreliable sources as their "citations" as well.
For example, Wikipedia claims that " two gender identities" is a new concept that only recently arose, which confirmable as being completely false.
Almost any ancient text will clearly define two genders of male and female and in some cases like the Old Testament, which is clearly attributed as being hundreds of years old without a doubt, confirms that people would even be persecuted for so much as dressing in the clothes of the opposite gender, this hints that gender divisions were extremely strict throughout all known history.
So I literally read on Wikipedia that the concept of "two genders" did not even exist until recently, which is just absurdly false.
I just want to read the truth, enough politics.
I have no problem believing transgenderism is a real thing if there's evidence for it but most evidence I see it just lies and anger and not real arguments.
It doesn't help that I've met real transgenders as well and all of the FTM transgenders i have personally met say they all struggle with their sanity and schizophrenia and that they have random violent tendencies as well.
I also don't like the fact that transgenderism was considered a legal mental illness in 2012 but in 2015 it was removed from the legal mental illness list out of nowhere with no explanation either.
