/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12992114

16KiB, 420x235, unnamed.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

The measurement problem

Anonymous Sat 17 Apr 23:22:35 2021 No.12992114 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12992310

I hate that we fucking call it the "measurement problem" when it should be the interaction problem instead to make it more intuitive.
>Things change when you beat the shit out of them
fucking DUH

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Apr 2021 23:48:15 No.12992257 Report

Quoted By:

bump

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Apr 2021 00:00:02 No.12992310 Report

Quoted By: >>12992342

>>12992114
agreed. the terminology in popsci is cringe.
>measurement problem
>observer effect
>wavefunction collapse
all of these are just woo-woo names for what happens when your system gets whacked by another system.

i wonder why no popsci people have tried to make "decoherence" a popularly known term? normies know all these weird sounding woo-woo terms, but nobody ever teaches them words for concepts that demystify things in QM and explain why all the serious non-popsci physicists who know QM to unanimously disdain woo-woo shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 18 Apr 2021 00:06:15 No.12992342 Report

Quoted By:

>>12992310
I know right? Popsci fucked physics over by indoctrinating retards and teaching them that science is supposed to be flashy and tied in a way that it's not because laymen can only picture about 1/5 of what current physics is and fill in the remaining 4/5 with nonsense that's still up in the air like many worlds or white holes or some other shit like that.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches