>>12979639the assumptions loud and ignorant people make about the world aren't relevant to science. Going off my example, the current understanding of magnetism could be wrong and the field lines are actually particle lines. Okay thats great, why cant we observe, manipulate, detect, test, or otherwise find them in any way? You don't think scientists haven't been studying magnets and electricity for hundreds of years now?
Maybe you just don't fully understand where we are with our model of the world. Like yeah originally electrons were postulated to orbit atoms like planets around a star. And indeed they do orbit but because they move at light speed its actually physically impossible to measure them. This is why quantum mechanics were developed, and it proved that electrons do orbit atoms, just not in the way we assumed they would. Again, we're defining reality based entirely on observation. We assumed electrons orbit atoms in the first place due to make things like spectral lines and EMF emissions. Ya know things you can directly observe without a theory.
Maybe somehow its not electron orbits, but if it wasn't you have an absolute shitload of observation to prove otherwise. Ergo its not wise to assume that we're massively wrong, rather we just don't have the right perspectives for a true theory of everything. And just because we don't have a theory of everything, doesn't mean science is fake or anything gay like that.
