on relativistic magnetism and induced emf
No.12970778 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>12970849 >>12970941 >>12971394 >>12971404
Okay Bare with me Sci
Thought Experiment
On our lab table we have a statically charged balloon, a loop of current carry wire, and 3 mini cyclotrons, the first configured to constantly accelerating a particle, the next in constant jerk, and the latter in constant snap/jounce. Remember the general rules
A stationary Charge emits an electric field
a moving charge emits a magnetic field
any derivative of motion of charge above velocity generates emf.
In our first run we set our lab frame to the static balloon, and than measure from that frame, the E and B and emf that is emitted by the other devices.
We than switch lab frames to the next derivative, setting our frame of reference to that of the moving charge, same records are taken from all the others. We repeat this over the next moments. We than compare and contrast what each of our lab frames saw
set 1 - lab frame - static ballon
Ballon = E field
Wire loop = B field
cyclotrons = various emf's
set 2 - lab frame - wire loop current
Ballon (no negative velocity) has magnetic field?
wire = E field
cyclotron A = Magnetic field
cylotron B, C = various emf
set 3 - cyclotron a
ballon - emf
wire = magnetic field
cyclotron a = electric field
cyclo b = magnetic field
cyclo c = emf
so on in so forth.
I'm not sure if this is what one would expect out of the results, but if one feels resonant in this analysis, It'd be cooler to try to increase the degree of quantitativeness, whats the magnitudes of the E B and wavelengths of EMF
Thought Experiment
On our lab table we have a statically charged balloon, a loop of current carry wire, and 3 mini cyclotrons, the first configured to constantly accelerating a particle, the next in constant jerk, and the latter in constant snap/jounce. Remember the general rules
A stationary Charge emits an electric field
a moving charge emits a magnetic field
any derivative of motion of charge above velocity generates emf.
In our first run we set our lab frame to the static balloon, and than measure from that frame, the E and B and emf that is emitted by the other devices.
We than switch lab frames to the next derivative, setting our frame of reference to that of the moving charge, same records are taken from all the others. We repeat this over the next moments. We than compare and contrast what each of our lab frames saw
set 1 - lab frame - static ballon
Ballon = E field
Wire loop = B field
cyclotrons = various emf's
set 2 - lab frame - wire loop current
Ballon (no negative velocity) has magnetic field?
wire = E field
cyclotron A = Magnetic field
cylotron B, C = various emf
set 3 - cyclotron a
ballon - emf
wire = magnetic field
cyclotron a = electric field
cyclo b = magnetic field
cyclo c = emf
so on in so forth.
I'm not sure if this is what one would expect out of the results, but if one feels resonant in this analysis, It'd be cooler to try to increase the degree of quantitativeness, whats the magnitudes of the E B and wavelengths of EMF
