>>12962977>there is no proof of that as it would require testing proven asymtpomatic people by infecting them without the vaccine, waiting for the body to remove the virus, then vaccinate and try to infect the person after the vaccine did its jobI have no idea what you're getting at. My point is, if someone gets vaccinated before exposure, they may never become the asymptomatic carrier that you're describing. We know the vaccines reduce infections, both symptomatic and asymptomatic.
>the vaccine doesnt prevent infection according to the producersPlease provide a source for that. They never at any point said they don't prevent infection. During the initial trials they said they prevented symptomatic infections, but couldn't confirm their effectiveness for asymptomatic infections. That has changed now.
>was it now?Anon, you're confused. I already provided a study where there was PCR and antibody testing for the duration of the study. There's numerous studies like this being performed at different hospitals. The evidence is conclusive that the vaccines are significantly reducing all infections, whether symptomatic or asympomatic.
Also, why are you grilling me and totally ignoring the OP which completely misrepresented what the study said?
