>>12962785>wow such a great video. Im sure this guy has no criticshe does, such as Jack Szostak
he also answers critics
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg>>12962760>yeah retardso you admit it is a petitio principii?
>fire and ashyou can assume with some certainty that the ash came from a type of oxidation because you can replicate it in a lab
>>12962772>OP is a fag who ignores posts that prove he's a moron >>12960015Im not the guy on the post you quoted, these are different people discussing
>>12962780>>12961340Ok i didnt see this one
>But it still is.If any and all fossiles are intermediates no matter their actual beings, there is a presumed irrefutable assumption that there are always intermidiates, but the fossiles are supposed to prove that there are intermidiates, therefore it is a petitio principii
>Pakicetus has features of the inner ear which only cetaceans possessgood wording there, "has features",it's cetacean-like (what about isnt ceatacean-like?)
also ad hoc, Pakicetus could be the new exception, as a matter of fact after discovering the whole skelleton it is considered the animal was fully terrestrial
https://www.thoughtco.com/pakicetus-pakistan-whale-1093256to base the assumption that has anything to do with whales by ignoring the majority of its structure and justifying it on the minor similarities is nonsensical
>The discovery of a more complete skeleton in 2001 prompted a reconsideration, and today Pakicetus is deemed to have been fully terrestrial;>A platypus bill is completely different from a duck's and other animals have billsthe point being made by the example is that it doesn't matter how different you think the bills are, if they are just similar in any way a taxonomist could use millions of years to say one was the ancestor of the other
>Pakicetus is not a mesonychid, so all of the claims about mesonychids are irrelevantsays who? current science? wait 10 years, frauds have taken longer to show up
