>>12942916Uhm how about actually proving it instead of using hypothetical arguments, "thought experiments," and bullshitting and broken logic?
For example if you actually build a fucking device that can go into space and put a camera on it you'll see the earth is round. People do this shit all the time, but you have never actually seen the earth from afar for yourself and so that's why you believe in this shit fuck off back to /x/.
Your entire arguments are always "remain ignorant" or "you don't know that it's round" (but many people actually do know that it's round because they've seen earth from fara away unlike you).
This isn't even hypothetical, 100% of your arguments are just questions or thought experiments rather than actual fucking proof.
"How do you know there isn't a monster hiding behind that tree?"
"You've never actually seen behind the tree have you?"
that's how you talk.
Meanwhile scientists fucking prove shit and then you, from your basement, will type the same hypothetical questions
"What would it take to make you believe the earth is flat?"
Well, considering you have to ask that question means you have brought no evidence with you. Open your eyes you are being used as a puppet. The government/companies are trying to make you stupid to sell you products and exploit you for money.
What would it take to make a flat earther realize they've never fucking seen the earth from space before but all the people who have said it's round?
