/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12929015

122KiB, 1280x720, popper.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 10:30:37 2021 No.12929015 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12929020 >>12929029 >>12929033 >>12929062 >>12929339 >>12929449 >>12930872 >>12932527 >>12933159

Thoughts on those falsified equations invented by Isaac Newton?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:32:22 No.12929020 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929015
sorry i dont know about such equations

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:34:44 No.12929029 Report

Quoted By: >>12929062 >>12929078

>>12929015
Falsification is a meme, no professional scientist takes these things too seriously. Read Feyerabend or something.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:36:32 No.12929033 Report

Quoted By: >>12929062

>>12929015
>MUH Popper
Philosophy is a meme

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:49:31 No.12929062 Report

Quoted By: >>12929076 >>12929256

>>12929015
popper is right. falsifiability is a necessity for hypothesis testing of any kind.
>>12929029
because those people employed as scientists don't actually do real science.
>>12929033
cringe

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:55:20 No.12929076 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929062
No, it's because it's mostly useless

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:55:38 No.12929078 Report

Quoted By: >>12929082

>>12929029
Does /sci/ have a book club or recommended reading list for philosophy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 10:57:08 No.12929082 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929078
No clue, I haven't posted in here for over two years

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 11:55:44 No.12929256 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929062
ur a little babby

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 12:27:39 No.12929339 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929015
>what are axioms and postulates

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:13:54 No.12929449 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929015
Technically wrong but still good enough. The gains in simplicity over Einstein's equations trump the loss in minuscule accuracy, even for rockets.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 19:49:46 No.12930872 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929015
They make for a very useful model as long as you are aware of their limitations. Do you not understand how models work?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 20:27:56 No.12931088 Report

Quoted By: >>12932590

I hate philosophers so fucking much

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 01:22:52 No.12932527 Report

Quoted By: >>12932537

>>12929015
They are very, very accurate for a large range of phenomenon, but are nevertheless falsified for very small ranges, very high speeds, and very strong gravitational fields.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 01:28:13 No.12932537 Report

Quoted By:

>>12932527
In that case you could even make the argument that Aristotle was right with his law of eventual stop, in that it's accurate on Earth at human scales.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 01:41:30 No.12932590 Report

Quoted By: >>12932974

>>12931088
Every good scientist is a philosopher in a way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 03:26:28 No.12932974 Report

Quoted By:

>>12932590
That's like saying every good chef is good at starting fires. Sure, this is technically true, but making fire from two sticks is irrelevant to the modern kitchen. Ridiculous metaphysical ponderings and ontology is irrelevant to science.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 04:44:26 No.12933159 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929015
Newton's laws were never falsified:
https://vixra.org/abs/2103.0149

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches