>>12928505my course does precisely what you mentioned in addition to:
- logic (lots of it: first order, linear temporal, computation tree...)
- shitload of probability and statistics (and it goes reasonably far beyond just the central limit theorem)
- algorithmic game theory
- category theory
our machine learning and deep learning courses are all very theory-oriented too. In our coursework we're not even allowed to use libraries and the exam is 100% theory (i.e., manually go through a neural network or a support vector machine, for instance)
codes and cryptography, image processing, computer graphics, computer vision, also very mathematics oriented.
in any case, you learn a lot of useful shit on a good cs degree (probably not those in america based on what is said here), but the main thing is, like someone mentioned earlier, nobody is superior to anyone by virtue of their degree alone. this especially applies to people on t his thread (and entire board by extension). there is nothing stopping compsci students from taking maths electives, or doing maths in their free time, joining maths societies, and so on. people on here talk as if because they are undergraduates in a subject they are comparable to the greats of that subject. the potential of a computer science student is precisely the same as that of a maths student, it comes down to how the individual hones their knowledge and how dedicated they are external to the insitution that they are currently at and the curriculum imposed by them. also, there's nothing stopping a compsci student developing a relationship with maths professors for instance; i keep in touch with plenty of maths professors whose modules i took as electives, for example.
