>>12916888Op, that is the most retarded thing I've seen.
>>12916941Yes you do
>>12919764Because of that you have the number 10 (or X) represented in the single digit column despite being base 10 (or X) which is retarded.
By putting something in the second digit means you have 10 sets of n (n=digit), by writing 10, you have 10 sets of 1 = 10, by writing X, means you have one set of X = X, however writing XX (which =110 in not retarded), implies one set of X, + X sets of X = 9X, what the fuck. Whats redundant about you shit system is that the 9 in the second digit means you have 9 sets of TEN, NOT X because X is in the single digit file, Other wise 9 sets of X = 8X (90), where 8_. represents 8 sets of X which = 7X, where 7_. = 6X and so on.
X^2 = 9X, but 10^2 =100, which one is more simple?
Also does that mean 1.X = 2 because you have X in the X'ths file which has to =1? that would be really dumb. 1.X^2 = 4 but .1^2 (0.1^2) = X^-2 (0.01)? remember you decided to get rid of 0 in your shitty system. why do any of that.
Your system is rubbish.
