>>12914462>Read Munkres' Analysis on Manifolds nextDoes this do a 'better' job of covering the kind of material in the final chapters of Principals of Mathematical Analysis (which I'm told are not worth it). What else does it cover, i.e. how much of the content is based around more 'abstract' forms of manifolds compared to R^n?
>Do you just want to learn Complex Analysis?I'm not really sure to be honest, it's not all that essential for me to learn for any particular application, but I feel it's something I ought to get around to understanding at some point, so I want to get a sense of what Real and Complex Analysis covers and whether this 'combined' approach, following on from Principles, is a worthwhile one.
