>>12916872>How would you prove something isn’t from here? You think earth has been here forever? How would you prove that?
>Water bubbles aren’t really bubbles. Like drops their tail is rather cone shapedWell they aren't "flat" either.
>North is the middle of the map.I figured there's would be at least one. So where is south?
>Answered before.Every magnet I've ever had has been "on the other side of the magnet". Not "the side that has no boundary" or "in the middle where neither pole is". Also you haven't explained shit.
>>12916911>These people are devout Christians.I don't care. Half the people here are devout atomists. What's the issue?
>>12916917>Works perfectly using FEM.what "flat earth model"? Which one are you referring to that is, there's like hundreds of them by this point.
>All our ancestors used FEM and accurately predicted all movements above hundreds of years into the future.All of them? Including the Pythagorean's who figured out earth was a sphere? Only religion and secularized metaphysical crackpots have stated "the earth is flat".
>Show the proof.Magnets exist. Show me the poles we use to navigate on a flat surface. It doesn't fucking work. I'm not going to "prove CGI photos" to you, I don't have to because that isn't "the foundation" in the first place. I don't care about pictures, I care about the explanation and "giant ice wall" is a description.
>It’s a strawman and you know it.So show me the "model" and explain it better then you moron. The nomenclature is "3 dimensional" for "xyz" and "2 dimensional" for "xy". What time cube tier reference/key are you using for your flat crap?
>I’d love to discuss it.So "how does mass do that"? You'd think that would be helpful to know before just assuming "hurr all the mass on earth is on a flat plane!". Why is it like that?
>Seems like you are halfway there.Well explain the rest then you jackwagon? What does that have to do with flat earth if "Space" is "filled space"?
