>>12912584>people are usually attracted to people with similar geneticsThat sounds like mostly bullshit. If a glass was to be filled with want, I'd put similar genetics at like 10% of the total volume. 65 million years ago, when man was first evolving into the dominant species on the planet, the strongest took regardless of genetics--because propagation was the driving instinct. Until language was born and codified as a way to pass knowledge across time, the idea of genetics mattering is comedy.
Language allowed the human race to create values, beliefs, and fact. It grounded the imperial immaterial into something many could hold between their fingers or explain through voice what they were thinking. Language led to writing. This added nuance, subtlety and context to what was originally being spoken and it allowed for layering of meaning. Which in turn spurred attraction across space and time, instead of previously being limited to only space.
Over the next hundred years, as technology evolved so did science and medicine alongside of it. There's ~7 billion people on the planet now, from a common ancestral pool of ~1,000 to 10,000. So the sheer level of genetic drift and mutation that has taken place, has changed the "genetics" game. What people attribute to "genetics" is more attributable to factors OTHER than genetics.
Case in point, pic related. Would you breed this woman to sire your children? Probably not. For many, there's nothing but desire to fuck with no consideration to time. She's got a nice face, great body, great tits, and she's neurotic; crazy--put it another way, she's PRIMAL. She invokes instincts that have long been suppressed by language and the map a 1,000 different emotions and feelings. But you wouldn't want her to father your children (I can't speak for all, but many would agree).
So why would you want to fuck her? Well, she's fit. Fitness has NOTHING to do with genetics. Everything to do with values.
1/2
