>>12906026Because it's true, you mouthbreathing sack of shit.
Statistics are true regardless of whatever personal experience corroborates it.
Since that is the case, why would you ever have to resort to using personal experience as a basis for an argument, unless you're somehow claiming the statistics are wrong.
You know nothing about logic, and here you are trying to get us to accept changing our logical rules so that you can consider yourself right, emotional petulant child.
Also:
>STEMfagsBack to your containment board retard.