/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12900569

620KiB, 957x555, 1548668392189.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 01:55:24 2021 No.12900569 View Reply Original Report

>there are people on here who don't understand the answer is 1

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1449156909503.jpg, 88KiB, 800x600

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 02:01:38 No.12900583 Report

Quoted By: >>12900731 >>12901413 >>12904530 >>12904580 >>12906267 >>12910534 >>12910831 >>12912493 >>12913102 >>12920987 >>12923375 >>12924090

>>12900569
>there are people here who don't understand how to factor 3th grade expressions

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1365487256446.jpg, 40KiB, 741x602

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 02:05:36 No.12900597 Report

Quoted By: >>12900664 >>12901403 >>12905964 >>12906267 >>12924385

>there are people here that don't know how to get free candy

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 02:27:56 No.12900664 Report

Quoted By: >>12900678 >>12900890 >>12906225 >>12906267 >>12912498

>>12900597
what part of this is wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 02:31:04 No.12900675 Report

Quoted By: >>12901032 >>12906267

>>12900569
You changed the settings on the TI to assume implicit parentheses. Both those operations are exactly the same, which is 1. Writing it with a slash changes nothing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 02:32:16 No.12900678 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900664
A piece subtly changes size in one step.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 02:53:21 No.12900731 Report

Quoted By: >>12900826 >>12900924 >>12906267 >>12925152

>>12900583
(x+iy)(x-iy) does not equal x2 + y2 + xy
are they actually teaching this? no wonder kids are retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:23:51 No.12900826 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900731
>(x+iy)(x-iy)
x^2+(i-i)xy-i^2y^2
i^=-1 and i-i=1 by new definition
x^2+xy--y^2=x^2+y^2+xy

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO chockolate math problem.jpg, 64KiB, 741x602

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:42:33 No.12900890 Report

Quoted By: >>12900914 >>12906267 >>12917682

>>12900664
Cutting a piece of chocolate doesn't make it longer somewhere else.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ((foo))((bar))).png, 73KiB, 450x1353

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:53:07 No.12900914 Report

Quoted By: >>12900933 >>12906267

>>12900890

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:55:07 No.12900919 Report

Quoted By: >>12900929 >>12900999 >>12906267

>6/2(1+2)
>6/2(3) stuff in parentheses first
>6/2(3) = 3(3) = 9
> you do multiplication and division from left to right together, not multiplication first and then division
>it's not P->E->M->D->A->S
>it's P->E->MD->AS
there are actually people out in society that don't remember this shit from elementary school

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 9FD9A807-7465-45F9-BBC7-79CBD8C2 (...).jpg, 178KiB, 540x720

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:56:13 No.12900923 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
>implying the obelus and solidus are the same

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:56:15 No.12900924 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900731
https://www.photopea.com/

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:57:46 No.12900929 Report

Quoted By: >>12900958 >>12900959 >>12900969 >>12906267 >>12915220 >>12923782

>>12900919
x=3
what is 6/2x

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO chockolate math problem2.jpg, 53KiB, 450x1353

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 03:58:10 No.12900933 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12914694

>>12900914
The extra piece comes from this big ass gap here at the end.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20210330-000346__01.jpg, 72KiB, 597x796

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:05:49 No.12900958 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12911753 >>12925107

>>12900929

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:05:53 No.12900959 Report

Quoted By: >>12900971 >>12906267 >>12923782

>>12900929
That depends. Are you asking 6/(2x) or (6/2)x

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:08:13 No.12900969 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900929
>x = 3, 6 / 2x
>6 / 2x = 6 / 2 * x ---> ab = a * b
>6 / 2 * 3 = 9

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:09:40 No.12900971 Report

Quoted By: >>12900990 >>12906267 >>12910175

>>12900959
that's the point of the original equation
it's purposefully ambiguous so that both 1 and 9 are technically correct answers but strict PEMDAS gives you 9

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:19:34 No.12900990 Report

Quoted By: >>12901408 >>12906267

>>12900971
Which is why division written in this format is atrocious and liberal use of parentheses to avoid ambiguity is the way to go.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:25:09 No.12900999 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900919
>nigger has never read a physics book
>nigger doesn't know about implicit multiplication

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:36:24 No.12901032 Report

Quoted By: >>12901044

>>12900675
That is default on the TI fren

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 04:42:46 No.12901044 Report

Quoted By:

>>12901032
Thanks for letting me know. I could never afford one lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 05:02:32 No.12901072 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>Implied multiplication has a higher priority than explicit multiplication to allow users to enter expressions, in the same manner as they would be written. For example, the TI-80, TI-81, TI-82, and TI-85 evaluate 1/2X as 1/(2*X), while other products may evaluate the same expression as 1/2*X from left to right. Without this feature, it would be necessary to group 2X in parentheses, something that is typically not done when writing the expression on paper.

>This order of precedence was changed for the TI-83 family, TI-84 Plus family, TI-89 family, TI-92 Plus, Voyage™ 200 and the TI-Nspire™ Handheld in TI-84 Plus Mode. Implied and explicit multiplication are given the same priority.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 07:36:46 No.12901403 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900597
kek I wonder if someone actually believes this

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 07:41:37 No.12901408 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900990
And that is what is done in any formal result. This is just some shit normal people freak out about on facebook or some shit, it has no impact on real mathematics or science at all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 07:45:44 No.12901413 Report

Quoted By: >>12904465 >>12906267 >>12925152

>>12900583
Factoring polynomials in 3rd grade???

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:10:52 No.12901453 Report

Quoted By: >>12901484 >>12906267

>>12900569
Texas Instruments blown the fuck out. What a fucking embarrassment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:23:12 No.12901484 Report

Quoted By: >>12901490 >>12901546 >>12906267

>>12901453
lolno, casio is a toy

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:25:07 No.12901490 Report

Quoted By: >>12901512 >>12906267

>>12901484
A toy that gives you the correct answer. Texas Instruments doesn't even understand the order of operations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:32:33 No.12901498 Report

Quoted By: >>12901655 >>12906267

>>12900569
my casio fx-82ex automatically adds parentheses when I press =
so
6÷2(1+2)
turns into
6÷(2(1+2))
just to show me that what I originally typed is ambiguous bullshit that needs to be disambiguated for it to make sense.
the calculator is nice enough to say which disambiguation it used in case that is a different one than I had in mind

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:37:14 No.12901509 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

Man, it's good to know that the Casio fanboys were completely wrong about which calculator is superior. TIs were also easier to program.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:38:14 No.12901512 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901490
>The irony

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:49:57 No.12901526 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
>t. I can't into parentheses

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:58:07 No.12901546 Report

Quoted By: >>12901551 >>12906267

>>12901484
1/2pi
>https://www.google.com/search?q=1%2F2pi
0.15915494309
>Casio 991ex
0.1591549431
>ti
1.570796327

kek, time to give Texas back to Mexico

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 08:59:56 No.12901551 Report

Quoted By: >>12901556 >>12905748 >>12906267

>>12901546
You understand that 1/2pi is equivalent to 0.5pi and not (2pi)^-1, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 09:03:27 No.12901556 Report

Quoted By: >>12901559 >>12906267

>>12901551
1/2pi is a meaningless string outside context.
either provide context or disambiguate it with parentheses or proper typesetting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 09:04:54 No.12901559 Report

Quoted By: >>12901625 >>12906267

>>12901556
You are dumb as hell

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 09:58:29 No.12901625 Report

Quoted By: >>12901679 >>12906267

>>12901559
maybe ti interprets "pi" as something else?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:21:38 No.12901655 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12910190

>>12901498
At least it defaults to the more reasonable disambiguation, unlike Texas Instruments.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:30:20 No.12901668 Report

Quoted By: >>12901675 >>12906267 >>12910396 >>12910765 >>12924313

>>12900569
BODMAS

Brackets
Orders (to the power of)
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction

1. 6/2(1+2)
2. 6/2(3)
3. 3(3)
4. 9

The answer is 9.

Also I just looked it up and apparently if there are two equivalent operators in the same expression, like multiplication and division (as seen in line 2 - 6/2(3)) then you should go from left to right, which is coincidentally what I did above.

So I think the answer is 9.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:34:36 No.12901675 Report

Quoted By: >>12901681 >>12901684 >>12904989 >>12906267 >>12910190

>>12901668
It's just a convention. And it just so happened that you and TI picked the dumbest convention. I stand by Casio's convention.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:39:16 No.12901679 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901625
Maybe you don't understand the order of operations

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:40:09 No.12901680 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

Casio gives you a different answer depending on whether you put a multiplication sign before the brackets or not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:40:19 No.12901681 Report

Quoted By: >>12901683 >>12904499 >>12906267

>>12901675
>Imagine being so retarded that you didn't understand how the order of operations worked

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:42:49 No.12901683 Report

Quoted By: >>12901691 >>12906267

>>12901681
I'm a fellow BODMAS chad but that Anon is right that there are different conventions which have different order of operations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:42:56 No.12901684 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901675
Go fuck yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:45:22 No.12901688 Report

Quoted By: >>12901699 >>12906267 >>12919858

Is this BODMAS PEMDAS some Murrican thing?
Here in Germany, we were taught Brackets before multiplication/division before addition/subtraction. That's it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:47:59 No.12901691 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901683
There's not

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:49:14 No.12901692 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>he keeps posting the same exact meme about ambiguous notation where we don’t know where the denominator ends

You need to have readable code and math notation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 10:54:03 No.12901699 Report

Quoted By: >>12901711 >>12906267

>>12901688
BODMAS is used in Britain, I think the other one is American

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 11:01:47 No.12901711 Report

Quoted By: >>12901722 >>12901731 >>12906267

>>12901699
I thought it was BIDMAS?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 11:05:07 No.12901722 Report

Quoted By: >>12901735 >>12906267

>>12901711
BODMAS is what I was taught, but I did GCSE maths about 15 years ago. So maybe it's changed since.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 11:07:04 No.12901731 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901711
I thought it was:
MENEER VAN DALEN WACHT OP ANTWOORD

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 11:07:53 No.12901735 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901722
Honestly you're probably right, I'm just retarded and didn't even get past Geometry before I dropped out of high school

Googling it yields no concrete results, other than the obvious (order vs indices)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 18:41:08 No.12904465 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12921859

>>12901413
And?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO file.png, 246KiB, 840x699

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 18:51:15 No.12904499 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12907039

>>12901681
Notice the /2? and how (i/?) is in parenthesis to avoid being read as i/(?p? r? ).

Standard physicist convention

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 18:56:37 No.12904530 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12925152

>>12900583
>teaching toddlers complex numbers
i sleep
>teacher doesn't understand the subject
NOW IM FUCKING MAD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 18:57:44 No.12904537 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
thanks for showing which brand to avoid

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 19:00:05 No.12904547 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

The TI-83 Plus is 3 to 4 times the price of the FX82MS so the answer is 9, poorfag.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 19:00:41 No.12904550 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
"Plain Text Notation" is broken and harmful.

Gutenberg kin degeneracy.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1487881739407.jpg, 13KiB, 473x356

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 19:07:33 No.12904580 Report

Quoted By: >>12904611 >>12906267 >>12910534

>>12900583
i^2 = -1 and i-i = 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 19:14:59 No.12904611 Report

Quoted By: >>12904706 >>12906267

>>12904580
>i-i = 1
i - i = 0

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 19:37:41 No.12904706 Report

Quoted By: >>12905218 >>12906267

>>12904611
Different i, this is a newly defined i

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 20:31:45 No.12904989 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901675
>i support DUMBAS

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 20:59:00 No.12905093 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12913119

Why would the multiplication come before the division? Is it because the 2 is right next to the parentheses? Anyway, this isn't how we were told to do it in school, and it is completely arbitrary, and irrelevant to the study of algebra.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 21:31:01 No.12905218 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12904706
i still don't see why would i-i - 1 given this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 30 Mar 2021 21:41:38 No.12905252 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
Probably even more people who don't understand how something that is not a question can have an answer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 00:03:11 No.12905697 Report

Quoted By: >>12905742 >>12906267

>>12900569
>TI gives correct answer
>Casio a shit
Figures

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 00:10:34 No.12905734 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
You can't trust that this is implemented identically in every case because there is no universally agreed upon implementation so you would have to check the implementation of your device.

This means that the correct answer is that you have to be a complete fucking retard to write your expressions in such a needlessly ambiguous way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 00:11:10 No.12905742 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12905697
TI is a shit and only bought by brainlets who need to get what everyone else is using.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 00:13:42 No.12905748 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12901551
No, anyone wanting 0.5pi would write pi/2. Style is important

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 00:15:49 No.12905757 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900569
a(b + c) = a*b + a*c = a * (b + c)

Therefore, a/b(c + d) = a/b * (c + d) not = a/(b * (c + d))

See?
It's 9

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 01:14:33 No.12905964 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267 >>12911236

>>12900597
that's not how you do it. you steal if from children

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 02:24:15 No.12906189 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>itt grade schoolers who only know pemdas vs post college chads who work in the real world

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 02:33:48 No.12906225 Report

Quoted By: >>12906267

>>12900664
Remove a piece, complete the square.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 02:40:53 No.12906256 Report

Quoted By: >>12906825 >>12923816

>>12900569
Multiplication is essentially the same shit as division. There's no reason to perform an operation contrary to the intended left-to-right order.
6/2 = 3
3*(1+2) = 9

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO another stupid order of operatio (...).png, 74KiB, 1580x824

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 02:42:46 No.12906267 Report

Quoted By: >>12906474

>>12900569
>>12900583
>>12900597
>>12900664
>>12900675
>>12900678
>>12900731
>>12900826
>>12900890
>>12900914
>>12900919
>>12900923
>>12900924
>>12900929
>>12900933
>>12900958
>>12900959
>>12900969
>>12900971
>>12900990
>>12900999
>>12901072
>>12901403
>>12901408
>>12901413
>>12901453
>>12901484
>>12901490
>>12901498
>>12901509
>>12901512
>>12901526
>>12901546
>>12901551
>>12901556
>>12901559
>>12901625
>>12901655
>>12901668
>>12901675
>>12901679
>>12901680
>>12901681
>>12901683
>>12901684
>>12901688
>>12901691
>>12901692
>>12901699
>>12901711
>>12901722
>>12901731
>>12901735
>>12904465
>>12904499
>>12904530
>>12904537
>>12904547
>>12904550
>>12904580
>>12904611
>>12904706
>>12904989
>>12905093
>>12905218
>>12905252
>>12905697
>>12905734
>>12905742
>>12905748
>>12905757
>>12905964
>>12906189
>>12906225
I hope you all remembered to sage

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 03:46:00 No.12906474 Report

Quoted By:

>>12906267
>dumbass doesn't know how to read

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 04:19:58 No.12906575 Report

Quoted By: >>12906675

I mean this is really just semantics about what order of operations you choose too follow.

Using the most widespread and adopted standard the answer is 9

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 04:50:08 No.12906675 Report

Quoted By:

>>12906575
>Using the most widespread and adopted standard the answer is 9
Only for lolis and shotas

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 05:46:57 No.12906825 Report

Quoted By: >>12906919 >>12908758 >>12912858

>>12906256
>intended left-to-right order.
no such thing unless the author specifically stated it. The operations have the same precedence so order does not matter.
or you are in an applied context like a programming language where the language has explicit parsing rules.

if it is a book the author is probably a retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 06:24:26 No.12906919 Report

Quoted By: >>12906952

>>12906825
>no such thing unless the author specifically stated it. The operations have the same precedence so order does not matter.
>or you are in an applied context like a programming language where the language has explicit parsing rules.

10-5-4
L->R 1
R->L 9

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 06:35:48 No.12906952 Report

Quoted By:

>>12906919
that is ambiguous and you are going to have to add either parentheses or pluses to make them unary negations

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 07:14:34 No.12907039 Report

Quoted By: >>12907043

>>12904499
>Physicists are mad at math
Who could have guessed?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 07:15:36 No.12907043 Report

Quoted By:

>>12907039
Bad*

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 18:03:23 No.12908758 Report

Quoted By: >>12908799 >>12914709

>>12906825
>no such thing
aww it's retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 18:13:29 No.12908799 Report

Quoted By: >>12911448

>>12908758
how is high school treating you

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 23:06:17 No.12910175 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900971
is there anything else than strict PEMDAS?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 23:11:10 No.12910190 Report

Quoted By: >>12910333 >>12919835

>>12901655
>>12901675
what is it with militant anons going to war against thousand years of convention

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Math progressing.png, 4KiB, 363x323

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 23:48:34 No.12910333 Report

Quoted By:

>>12910190
>thousand years of convention
kek

Look at this historically illiterate pleb

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 23:52:04 No.12910353 Report

Quoted By: >>12910366

HOW CAN YOU DIVIDE SOMETHING INTO 0.5 GROUPS?
THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE
DON'T CALL IT DIVIDING IF YOU'RE JUST MULTIPLYING IN REVERSE

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 31 Mar 2021 23:55:06 No.12910366 Report

Quoted By: >>12910393

>>12910353
yeah wtf
same goes for substracting.
It's not substracting, it's addition with negative number

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 00:02:51 No.12910393 Report

Quoted By:

>>12910366
this and it makes more sense to think of it that way too
I never actually learned how to subtract or divide I just added and multiplied in reveres

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 00:03:05 No.12910396 Report

Quoted By: >>12910441

>>12901668
This. How can /sci/ be so stupid? It's LITERALLY child's play.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 00:17:47 No.12910441 Report

Quoted By:

>>12910396
>calling Landau stupid

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 00:48:11 No.12910534 Report

Quoted By: >>12925152

>>12900583
>>12904580
Why would they write it i-i? Clearly it would make more sense as i * -i = 1
Does the math work out? I'm too lazy to grab a piece of paper to work it out.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 01:50:54 No.12910752 Report

Quoted By: >>12911349

Listen, retards. All serious practicing scientists give the "/" sign a lower precedence. Typically we'd have formula like
> abc/(def)
but who has the time for parenthesis. Just write
>abc / def
It CANNOT mean
>(abc / d)*ef
because that's retarded way of writing
>abcef / d
Nobody does that.

There is usually only one "/" in the formula, there is no confusion.
>but what about ab / ( cd/ef )
that's retarded too. Normalize it

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 01:53:09 No.12910765 Report

Quoted By: >>12924336

>>12901668
americans write / as a fraction, so you would get 6 [over] 2(3)
= 6 [over] 6
= 1
[spoiler:lit]i agree the answer is 9, though

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 02:06:28 No.12910831 Report

Quoted By: >>12918844

>>12900583
>3th

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 04:29:47 No.12911236 Report

Quoted By:

>>12905964
steal it from black children* so they know what it's like to be stolen from before moving into adulthood

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 04:30:49 No.12911241 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
the first calculator is a load of shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 05:32:43 No.12911349 Report

Quoted By:

>>12910752
this

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 06:24:48 No.12911448 Report

Quoted By:

>>12908799
show your knuckles

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 07:46:55 No.12911608 Report

Quoted By:

What is "the transitive property" for 400 Alex

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 08:55:15 No.12911753 Report

Quoted By: >>12921034

>>12900958
am i retarded. shouldnt the answer be 1.

6/2x x=3

6 / 2(3)

6 / 6 = 1

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ANSWER.jpg, 16KiB, 388x191

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 11:50:52 No.12912165 Report

Quoted By: >>12936890

>>12900569
when your faced with a formula of equal ranked operators like divide and multiply, then the operation is from left to right.
the answer is 9.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 12:41:10 No.12912288 Report

Quoted By: >>12912343

>>12900569
"6 / 2(1+2)" != "6 / 2*(1+2)"
"6 / 2(1+2)", is invalid syntax, if the implementation chooses to accept this syntax then it may parse it however it likes that may be as
The two most common parses are, "6 / 2*(1+2)" or "6 / (2*(1+2))"
Can we end this stupid unending argument, this is not a maths question, its a debate over parsing invalid syntax.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 13:15:53 No.12912342 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
there is not correct answer

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 13:16:22 No.12912343 Report

Quoted By: >>12912471

>>12912288
>6 / (2*(1+2))
The answer is 9, not 1.
Why are you so hell bent on parsing it incorrectly?
Why are going right to left, instead of left to right?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO wojack_greentext.jpg, 48KiB, 668x718

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 13:23:38 No.12912358 Report

Quoted By: >>12912490

this thread is pathetic, imagine arguing over an invented convention for something that is fundamentally ambiguous and therefore there is no 'correct' answer

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 14:02:36 No.12912471 Report

Quoted By: >>12912490 >>12912503 >>12912794

>>12912343
There is no correct parse because its invalid syntax. 6 / 2(1+2). Do you see a multiplication operator anywhere in this equation? There is no operator between 2 and (1+2).

Making 6 / 2(1+2) = 6 / 2*(1+2), is a waste of good syntax, if you meant 6 / 2*(1+2) just insert 6 / 2*(1+2). Having it resolve to 6 / (2*(1+2)) is much more useful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 14:08:30 No.12912490 Report

Quoted By:

>>12912358
If an engineer made a gadget where the calculated amount of "whatever" was a formula like this "ambiguous" one, then the fact the gadget worked as expected/predicted is proof..
if he did it the wrong way then wouldn't he notice it not working properly?
>>12912471
>6 / (2*(1+2)) is much more useful.
(6/2) * (1+2) gives the right answer.
6 / (2*(1+2)) does not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 14:09:12 No.12912493 Report

Quoted By: >>12918844

>>12900583
>3th
yeah im thinking retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 14:11:40 No.12912498 Report

Quoted By: >>12914501

>>12900664
two of the pieces subtly turn into half sized pieces

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 14:12:47 No.12912503 Report

Quoted By:

>>12912471
>Do you see a multiplication operator anywhere in this equation?
yes.
E=mc^2
E = m * c^2
no operator means its a multiplication.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 15:47:48 No.12912794 Report

Quoted By:

>>12912471
>2(1+2). Do you see a multiplication operator anywhere in this equation?
>There is no operator between 2 and (1+2).
ok.... we'll solve as if formula was just 2(1+2)
2(1+2)
= 2(3)
= 6

....OR....

2(1+2)
= 2(1) +2(2)
= 2 + 4
= 6

.....so yes.....
2(1+2)
= 2 * (1+2)
= 2 * 1 + 2 * 2

no operator means its a multiplication.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO google-math.jpg, 47KiB, 834x515

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 16:11:58 No.12912858 Report

Quoted By: >>12914588

>>12906825
>>intended left-to-right order.
>no such thing unless the author specifically stated it.
yes, it is left to right.
its an actual rule

http://www.montereyinstitute.org/courses/DevelopmentalMath/COURSE_TEXT_RESOURCE/U01_L5_T2_text_final.html
>The order of operations requires that all multiplication and division be performed first, going from left to right in the expression. The order in which you compute multiplication and division is determined by which one comes first, reading from left to right.
from left to right.

https://www.freemathhelp.com/order-of-operations.html
>The order of operations will allow you to solve this problem the right way. The order is this: Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and finally Addition and Subtraction. Always perform the operations inside a parenthesis first, then do exponents. After that, do all the multiplication and division from left to right, and lastly do all the addition and subtraction from left to right.
from left to right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 18:22:55 No.12913056 Report

Quoted By:

>what is a parser

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 18:38:01 No.12913102 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900583
subtle. i love it

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Apr 2021 18:43:25 No.12913119 Report

Quoted By: >>12915174 >>12915226

>>12905093
There's apparently a convention among some people that multiplication without a sign has higher priority. It makes sense in certain scenarios like x/2y is obviously x/(2y) and not (x/2)y.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1365520265910.gif, 303KiB, 499x500

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 02:30:52 No.12914501 Report

Quoted By:

>>12912498
>2

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:00:33 No.12914588 Report

Quoted By: >>12914624

>>12912858
>yes, it is left to right.
there really is no such thing as left to right for multiplication and division unless you are using a programming language or a calculator.
In that case, by necessity, there has to be rules for how it parses an expression.

In written language? There is no such thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:13:35 No.12914624 Report

Quoted By: >>12914637

>>12914588
>In written language? There is no such thing.
yes there is... it is an actual rule..
try googling it and see for yourself.
IT IS AN ACTUAL MATH RULE.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:20:31 No.12914637 Report

Quoted By: >>12914709

>>12914624
>IT IS AN ACTUAL MATH RULE.
lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:45:07 No.12914694 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900933
spottem and gottem

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO viral math problem.png, 17KiB, 600x338

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:50:39 No.12914709 Report

Quoted By: >>12914712 >>12914728 >>12914748 >>12936896

>>12914637
YES, IT ACTUALLY IS...
That is why this anon >>12908758, called you a retard.
https://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2016/08/31/what-is-6%C3%B7212-the-correct-answer-explained/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URcUvFIUIhQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_W7gW0wDcI

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:52:57 No.12914712 Report

Quoted By: >>12914719

>>12914709
it is a meaningless string of symbols
there is no "solution" unless the one who wrote it disambiguates it by providing e.g. context

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 03:55:37 No.12914719 Report

Quoted By: >>12914728 >>12914989

>>12914712
if you don't provide context, then it is left to right by default..
it is an actual math rule.
they teach this in primary school.

stop trolling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 04:01:23 No.12914728 Report

Quoted By: >>12914748

>>12914719
>if you don't provide context, then it is left to right by default..
I know you want math to "always make sense" and "never be ambiguous" but it does not work like that
you can easily write outright nonsense if you are lazy, like the expression tin this picture >>12914709
there is no "left to right"
primary schoolers and even high schoolers are not taught about associativity and axioms and what not

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 04:11:36 No.12914748 Report

Quoted By:

>>12914728
yes, it is an actual math rule...
yes, it is left to right...
if people are lazy & write out their formula incorrectly, then it doesn't mean the rule no longer exists..
it means the rule still exists & someone has failed to write out their formula correctly.
The anon >>12914709 is correct.

Find me a legitimate math webpage that supports your argument or stop trolling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 06:34:35 No.12914989 Report

Quoted By: >>12914991

>>12914719
>they teach this in primary school.
They teach you many incorrect things in primary school.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 06:36:14 No.12914991 Report

Quoted By: >>12915113 >>12918020

>>12914989
Find me a legitimate math webpage that supports your argument or stop trolling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 07:38:54 No.12915113 Report

Quoted By: >>12915174 >>12915744 >>12917810 >>12917848 >>12917856 >>12918167 >>12919787 >>12919794 >>12919804 >>12919944

>>12914991
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mixed_division_and_multiplication

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:14:13 No.12915174 Report

Quoted By: >>12915603 >>12917810 >>12919787

>>12915113
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mixed_division_and_multiplication
>For example, the manuscript submission instructions for the Physical Review journals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division with a slash, and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifshitz and the Feynman Lectures on Physics
this is NOT an entry from any of these above mentioned "exceptions"...
>exceptions?.....
All this is written under the topic "Special cases"...
wiki listed this under "Special cases"... lmao
>However, in some of the academic literature
lmao, its not even universal within that one niche market.
this is why no-one refuted >>12913119, because everyone already knows this.
this is not an "everyone" knows this when reading this specific journal "Special case exception"..
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6/2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
google "6/2(1+2) solution"

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:38:02 No.12915209 Report

Quoted By: >>12915603 >>12915744

>>12900569
>there are people here who don't understand the difference between / and ÷

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:41:44 No.12915220 Report

Quoted By: >>12915226 >>12915233

>>12900929
God damn multiplication symbols can be omitted, this is not ambiguous at all.

6/2x is 6/2*x is (6/2)*x. Unambiguously. It never means 6/(2x). The latter expression NEEDS parantheses.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:44:04 No.12915226 Report

Quoted By: >>12915253 >>12915277

>>12913119
That's wrong. See >>12915220
Operators act on the entities left and right of them. If they aren't in parantheses, we'll, they aren't. x/2y is unambiguously (x/2)*y, regardless of your feelings.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:46:31 No.12915233 Report

Quoted By: >>12915277

>>12915220
>It never means 6/(2x).
No, it never means (6/2)x. Good math style requires you to write 6x/2 for that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:55:27 No.12915253 Report

Quoted By: >>12915261 >>12915277

>>12915226
>x/2y is unambiguously (x/2)*y, regardless of your feelings
Literally nobody would every write that over xy/2. This is basic universal style guideline for mathematics. There's a reason you never see $x\pi i 2$ rather than $2\pi i x$ .

$x/2\pi$ is $\frac{x}{2\pi }$
https://www.google.com/search?q=x%2F2pi

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 08:59:42 No.12915261 Report

Quoted By: >>12915272

>>12915253
ok, now replace pi with any integer. choose 4, then look at what google gives you; the opposite. it's an error based on the way google parses the characters "pi" after a number

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 09:03:35 No.12915270 Report

Quoted By: >>12915285

>>12900569
if you do it properly:

6/2*(1+2)
6/2*3
3*3
9

do they not teach algebra? admittedly it looks a little confusing on one line.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 09:03:56 No.12915272 Report

Quoted By: >>12915279

>>12915261
No, it's implicit multiplication.

When you get to college, you'll understand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 09:06:54 No.12915277 Report

Quoted By:

>>12915233
>Good math style requires you to write 6x/2 for that.
I agree, but that's no argument against what I said. Math formulae have to be unambiguous and the only way this works is explained in >>12915226, so that 6/2x = 6x/2, since multiplication can be shifted anywhere without changing anything in scalar formulae.

>>12915253
>Literally nobody would every write that over xy/2
That's true, but irrelevant.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 09:08:12 No.12915279 Report

Quoted By:

>>12915272
Surely you must be retarded to think that google would parse x/2pi as anything other than x/2pi. Its reserved, and there was proper code written to account for this special case, because of the convention <number>pi. Now plz look at what happens when you put in x/2*4

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 09:13:12 No.12915285 Report

Quoted By:

>>12915270
>do they not teach algebra
PEMDAS

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 12:19:08 No.12915603 Report

Quoted By: >>12915723 >>12917810 >>12919804 >>12919944

>>12915209
>>there are people here who don't understand the difference between / and ÷
this anon is pointing out the rule here >>12915174
>multiplication is of higher precedence than division with a slash
insisting "slash" means 6/(2*(1+2)) = 1
insisting "divide" means (6÷2)*(1+2) = 9

the above "rules" was exclusive to various physics journals because they "choose" to...
sure, why not....
whats funny is that the two calculators >>12900569, say the opposite...
kek!!

they can't even agree to disagree!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 13:21:45 No.12915723 Report

Quoted By: >>12915744 >>12915864 >>12924160

>>12915603
>insisting "slash" means 6/(2*(1+2)) = 1
>insisting "divide" means (6÷2)*(1+2) = 9
No, actually the inverse. The "divide" has two dots, which mean "put everything on the left on top, put everything on the right to the bottom". It abbreviates the horizontal line in fractions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 13:27:59 No.12915744 Report

Quoted By: >>12915864

>>12915723
>No, actually the inverse. The "divide" has two dots, which mean "put everything on the left on top, put everything on the right to the bottom". It abbreviates the horizontal line in fractions.
yes, thats what divide means, bruh!!
both / and ÷ mean the same thing.

thats not what was stated by the anon here >>12915113, which is what this notation argument >>12915209 is about.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 14:10:46 No.12915864 Report

Quoted By: >>12915934 >>12915955

>>12915744
>both / and ÷ mean the same thing.
No, learn to read.
I'll state it again%
>>12915723
>The "divide" has two dots, which mean "put everything on the left on top, put everything on the right to the bottom".
As opposed to the "slash", which is an operator acting in the entities directly left and right of it.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO makes no difference.jpg, 114KiB, 1722x530

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 14:29:11 No.12915934 Report

Quoted By: >>12917552 >>12917567 >>12920176

>>12915864
No, learn to read.
I'll state it again%
>>The "divide" has two dots, which mean "put everything on the left on top, put everything on the right to the bottom".
>As opposed to the "slash", which is an operator acting in the entities directly left and right of it.
makes no difference
idiots can't even agree to disagree!!

IF you get the answer = 1, then you are WRONG and masturbating in you're moms basement...
again....

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 14:35:44 No.12915955 Report

Quoted By: >>12917552 >>12917567

>>12915864
Is this your newest way to troll the answer is 1?
Are you OP?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 21:41:34 No.12917552 Report

Quoted By: >>12917567 >>12917810 >>12917848 >>12917856

>>12915934
>>12915955
Are you fucking retarded? I'll spell it out for babbies:
$6/2(1+2) = \frac{6}{2}\cdot (1+2)$
$6÷2(1+2) = \frac{6}{2(1+2)}$
and generally
$a/bcd = \frac{a}{b}\cdot c \cdot d$
$a÷bcd = \frac{a}{bcd}$

>makes no difference
You're goddamn shit at reading.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 21:44:11 No.12917567 Report

Quoted By: >>12917810 >>12918852 >>12924160

>>12917552
>>12915934
>>12915955
And just to reiterate, because you imbeciles will still refuse to get it:
÷ is a shorthand notation for "put EVERYTHING on the left in the numerator, put EVERYTHING on the right in the denominator". As opposed to /, which means "divide the nearest left expression by the nearest right expression". It's an abbreviation because not everybody has time to use latex.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO chocolate.gif, 443KiB, 460x599

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:08:17 No.12917682 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900890
fake news, world hunger solved

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO another stupid order of operatio (...).png, 74KiB, 1580x824

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:17:40 No.12917714 Report

Quoted By: >>12917848 >>12917856

EVERY TIME I SEE THIS THREAD POSTED I WANT TO TO RAPE OP!
>SAGE ALL ORDER OF OPERATIONS THREADS
>IGNORE ALL ORDER OF OPERATIONS POSTERS
>MAKE /SCI/ A BOARD FOR NON-MONGOLOIDS

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:24:45 No.12917745 Report

Quoted By:

Who the fuck uses ÷ ? Are you 7 yo

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:42:50 No.12917810 Report

Quoted By: >>12917985 >>12919794

>>12917552
>>12917567
so you regurgitate everything I'd already ;stated >>12915603 >>12915174
no-one gives a fuck if your notation is opposite >>12915113.. you both suck on dick.

so you now wriggle and squirm like a worm to make it seem you've said a new thing, when you've just restated whats already stated..
yeh, we already know, I've already said it..
you switch teams like undies..
fuck off bullshit troll.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:49:30 No.12917848 Report

Quoted By:

>>12917552
no one else enforces nor seems to use your "ideal" interpretation of the rules, you're just an opposite weirdo to >>12915113
the answer is 1, regardless if the operation uses a / or ÷ >>12917714

(YOU) are OP!!!!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:51:44 No.12917856 Report

Quoted By: >>12917985

>>12917552
no one else enforces nor seems to use your "ideal" interpretation of the rules, you're just an opposite weirdo to >>12915113
the answer is 9 not 1, regardless if the operation uses a / or ÷ >>12917714

(YOU) are OP!!!!!!

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 61sUgi4lgpL._AC_SL1493_.jpg, 108KiB, 738x1493

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 22:52:44 No.12917860 Report

Quoted By:

>There are people on here who don't use fx-115ES

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1615838825255.jpg, 66KiB, 500x625

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 23:03:21 No.12917884 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
I get that people like to feel powerful. Like HA! I know something you dont lawl! Well achk2ualie, older people grew up learning to kinda bunch expressions together, its just how they did it and it made sense giving the technology and applications of math at the time. Nowadays with the advent of computing and programming and the integral role math plays in those fields, distribution took over. Probably because of the way computers calculate etc. Whatever, the point is that you're a retard who is a retard. This is a meaningless question without context and either way is right depending on application.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 23:29:41 No.12917985 Report

Quoted By: >>12918020 >>12918167

>>12917810
>hurrr durrr
Learn to read. You said they were the same thing, yet they weren't. What you say in that post is completely irrelevant to that.
>fuck off bullshit troll.
>noooo I'm not trolling, you're trolling
Imbecile.

>>12917856
>the answer is 9 not 1, regardless if the operation uses a / or ÷
Wrong, since they have different meanings. However hard you them not to.

>(YOU) are OP!!!!!!
Absolutely not. I'm not gay.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 02 Apr 2021 23:36:37 No.12918020 Report

Quoted By:

>>12917985
>I've settled this by my own clarification.
>I've decide to be opposite to these >>12914991 weirdos.
no one recognizes nor uses your methods.
it exists in a fantastical world of your moms basement.

(YOU) are OP

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO (YOU).jpg, 25KiB, 773x571

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 00:07:06 No.12918167 Report

Quoted By: >>12919282 >>12919313

>>12917985
>I've settled this by my own clarification.
>I've decide to be opposite to these >>12915113 weirdos.
No one recognizes nor uses your definition.
It exists in the fantastical world of your moms basement.

(YOU) are OP

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 03:29:51 No.12918844 Report

Quoted By: >>12921697

>>12910831
>>12912493
>he didn't learn factoring in the threeth grade

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 03:32:34 No.12918852 Report

Quoted By: >>12919282 >>12919313

>>12917567
>source: my ass

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 06:53:14 No.12919282 Report

Quoted By: >>12919306 >>12919319

>>12918167
No, I simply know the difference between / and ÷. Why do you think these two symbols exist? Why do you think the latter is horizontal, looking like a fraction?
Goddamn you are retarded.

>>12918852
Contrary to you, I actually went to university.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:03:12 No.12919306 Report

Quoted By:

>>12919282
assity

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:04:40 No.12919313 Report

Quoted By: >>12919326 >>12920159

>>12918167
>>12918852
>hurrrr you're wroooong because my FEELINGS tell me you're wrong
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_(mathematics)
Get rekt.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:06:41 No.12919319 Report

Quoted By: >>12919897

>>12919282
>Physics journals use "/" exactly as I demand everyone should be using "÷"
>keeping the faith..
>following of one
Don't worry anon, in time you'll have a following by your side, jerking off together in your moms basement.

someone will give a shit eventually.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:08:46 No.12919326 Report

Quoted By: >>12919338 >>12920143

>>12919313
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_(mathematics)
>the ISO 80000-2 standard for mathematical notation recommends.....
>recommends....
Don't worry anon, in time you'll have a following by your side, jerking off together in your moms basement.

someone will give a shit eventually.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:16:23 No.12919338 Report

Quoted By: >>12919358 >>12919364

>>12919326
>>the ISO 80000-2 standard for mathematical notation recommends
Yes? And? How does that contradict anything I said?
Your reading comprehension is less than dogshit. In the whole article it's used exactly as I explained, whip the obelus is shunned for the reason I explained.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO its a button!!!!.jpg, 4KiB, 105x93

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:23:17 No.12919358 Report

Quoted By: >>12919538

>>12919338
>Yes? And? How does that contradict anything I said?
because no one gives a shit..
you're a spastic teen jerking off in moms basement playing with your graphics calculator, found a button that makes it easier than using brackets.... and thinks you're the only one who knows about it!!!
Fuck off child.
no one cares

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:25:52 No.12919364 Report

Quoted By: >>12919538 >>12919581

>>12919338
>Physics journals use "/" exactly as I demand everyone should be using "÷"
>keeping the faith..
>following of one
Don't worry anon, in time you'll have a following by your side, jerking off together in your moms basement.

someone will give a shit eventually.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 07:28:35 No.12919369 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
6÷2(1+2) = 9
6/2(1+2) = 9
EASY
next

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 09:05:56 No.12919538 Report

Quoted By: >>12919579

>>12919358
>because no one gives a shit..
Pathetic cop-out
>cursing
Pretty much accepting I'm right. Thanks.
>no one cares
OP obviously does, and so does everybody interested in the etymology of mathematical symbols and the weird difference in calculator behavior.

>>12919364
Highly suspecting samefag. No two people here are this stupid.
>>Physics journals use "/" exactly as I demand everyone should be using "÷"
Then link one where that happens. My source supports what I said. You haven't posted a single argument for why you feel you're right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 09:20:46 No.12919579 Report

Quoted By: >>12919755

>>12919538
>ohhhh mommmy!! the kids won't play with me...
>ohhhh mommmy!! the physics journals told me to fuck off...
>ohhhh mommmy!! they all know I'm the same OP faggot posting this lame thread over & over...
>ohhhh mommmy!! they all know I'm a dickhead loser!!..
the answer is 9..
you're the same fuckhead OP faggot posting this same shit over & over..
take a hint & fuck off

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 09:22:26 No.12919581 Report

Quoted By: >>12919590

>>12919364
>>Physics journals use "/" exactly as I demand everyone should be using "÷"
Not him. If that were true, the answer to the question would be 1. That's obviously wrong, both by the example op showed and consensus. My bet is on you trolling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 09:26:13 No.12919590 Report

Quoted By: >>12919755

>>12919581
>ohhhh mommmy!! thankyou for buying me a second computer...
fuck of faggot & give your ass a rest.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 10:49:24 No.12919755 Report

Quoted By: >>12919765

>>12919579
>the answer is 9..
I never doubted that. You must be IRL retarded. Sorry if I offended you with... agreeing?
>take a hint & fuck off
Why would I? I presented my arguments, described what the symbols mean, posted a source. All you've done is RRREEEEEEing without doing any of the above. I think >>>/b/ is better for you.

>>12919590
Funny how some people start to seethe so hard when they're presented with evidence against their binary worldview. Need some bengay for your ass?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 10:58:04 No.12919765 Report

Quoted By: >>12919780

>>12919755
>I'm the same OP pushing the answer is 1 in repetitive threads, but you can't prove shit...
>I'm the dipshit teen who gets caught up in every IEE notation memo & think others give a shit...
>I'm a schizz who's now plays with a new button I found on my calculator and think its a sign from God...
jeez you're really pushing the faggot boundary, bruh!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:09:57 No.12919780 Report

Quoted By: >>12919787 >>12919794 >>12919804

>>12919765
>>I'm the same OP pushing the answer is 1
I never did that.
>>I'm the dipshit teen who gets caught up in every IEE notation memo
I don't know what that means.
>>I'm a schizz who's now plays with a new button I found on my calculator and think its a sign from God...
I literally posted a source.

Where's your's? Certainly it's easy to find physics papers that use it as you claim.

>jeez you're really pushing the faggot boundary
Yeah, but not in the direction you imply.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:16:09 No.12919787 Report

Quoted By:

>>12919780
yes, you are OP.
yes, you do
no one uses your notation, even >>12915113 special-case >>12915174 ignore your meme bullshit
you literally found a new button on your calculator and can't stop jerking off to it..

you're obviously a child newbie who spends the weekends as a slut groupie giving head to IEE members.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:22:07 No.12919794 Report

Quoted By: >>12919802

>>12919780
yes, you are OP.
yes, you do
no one uses your notation, even >>12915113 special-case >>12917810 ignore your meme bullshit
you literally found a new button on your calculator and can't stop jerking off to it..

you're obviously a child newbie who spends the weekends as a slut groupie giving head to IEE members.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:24:20 No.12919802 Report

Quoted By: >>12919811 >>12919819 >>12919829

>>12919794
Again, I posted a source, you didn't. Seems like you're seething so hard because you know you're wrong.
>found a new button on your calculator
I don't own calculators. They're a scam.

Sorry pal, looks like you lost the game hard. Unless you can present some arguments or sources, feel free to RRREEEEEE even harder.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:25:08 No.12919804 Report

Quoted By: >>12919829

>>12919780
yes, you are OP.
yes, you do
no one uses your notation, even >>12915113 special-case >>12915603 ignore your meme bullshit
you literally found a new button on your calculator and can't stop jerking off to it..

you're obviously a child newbie who spends the weekends as a slut groupie giving head to IEE members.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:27:45 No.12919811 Report

Quoted By: >>12919829

>>12919802
you posted irrelevant wind-bagging that was in line with your own OCD and immediately jerked off to it.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO machine-god.jpg, 49KiB, 300x411

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:31:26 No.12919819 Report

Quoted By: >>12919829

>>12919802
Are you Disposable, aka Smiley?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:35:29 No.12919829 Report

Quoted By: >>12919838 >>12919846 >>12919850

>>12919811
>Wikipedia
>article under quality control of experts in the field
>wind-bagging
Errr, no. You talking out if your ass is. And it stinks.

>>12919819
You mean whether I'm the author of the comic you posted? No.

>>12919804
Why did you delete you post? Ashamed of it? Answer is here >>12919802
I'm obviously not OP, since I disagreed with him since my very first post here. Guess it's too difficult for you to follow a comment chain though. Can't say I'm surprised given the worthless idiocy you've been spreading here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:37:42 No.12919835 Report

Quoted By:

>>12910190
>thousand years of convention

no

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO restart.gif, 475KiB, 220x220

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:38:33 No.12919838 Report

Quoted By: >>12919884

>>12919829
no one follows your notation bullshit.
you have an OCD glitch.
yes, you are OP.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:44:41 No.12919846 Report

Quoted By: >>12919884 >>12920143

>>12919829
>2019
following new fads is super gay.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:49:44 No.12919850 Report

Quoted By: >>12919884

>>12919829
Smiley didn't author the comic
Everyone, we have found Smiley!!!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 11:57:32 No.12919858 Report

Quoted By:

>>12901688
i was taught the same back in the 90s

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 12:05:29 No.12919884 Report

Quoted By: >>12919944

>>12919838
My source says otherwise. Still waiting for all those physics papers you mentioned.

>>12919846
True.

>>12919850
I don't know who either Smiley or Disposable are.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 12:11:54 No.12919897 Report

Quoted By: >>12919944

>>12919319
they shall be known as the crusty docks cabal

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 12:30:21 No.12919944 Report

Quoted By: >>12920125

>>12919884
>sources
no arguments from me, we'll add multiple personality disorder to your list of disorders.
>papers
you are irrelevant to the manuscript submissions for all journals mentioned in link >>12915113 >>12915603, and too stupid to work that out for yourself.

>2019 ISO standards
again no argument from me, you are self-confessed super gay.

we're all laughing at you Smiley, not with you.

>>12919897
>crusty docks cabal
kek, duly entered.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1614916997708.png, 200KiB, 597x559

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:00:29 No.12920030 Report

Quoted By: >>12920139

>this thread again

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:29:48 No.12920125 Report

Quoted By: >>12920139

>>12919944
>no arguments from me
I know. That's why everything you say can be discarded. You present neither arguments, nor sources. Just a complete failure.
>you are irrelevant to the manuscript submissions
What does this even mean?
>again no argument from me
See above.
>we're all laughing at you
>we're
I'll add multiple personality disorder to your list of disorders.

>disorders
>irrelevant
>too stupid
>super gay
>laughing at you
So, you got nothing but empty swearing. Truly cultured, Anon. I'm sure all the underage posters here are impressed by your display of cursing prowess. Despite being provably wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:30:28 No.12920127 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
What is the question?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:32:15 No.12920134 Report

Quoted By: >>12920158

>>12900569
÷ is a shorthand notation for a fraction line. You'd have to use parantheses on a calculator to input large expressions with only /, and ÷ is an abbreviation for doing so.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:33:43 No.12920139 Report

Quoted By: >>12920158

>>12920030
this..
we can thank OP, the teenage edgelord faggot here >>12920125 now jerking off in front of the mirror while posting on /sci/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:35:04 No.12920143 Report

Quoted By: >>12920159

>>12919846
ISO Was your argument btw, not mine. See >>12919326

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:35:46 No.12920149 Report

Quoted By: >>12920158

>>12900569
6÷2(1+2) = 9
6/2(1+2) = 9
All other answers are schizo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:37:23 No.12920158 Report

Quoted By: >>12920176 >>12920250

>>12920139
>hurrrr you're OP
>even though you disagree with him
>that's the only argument I got durrrrr
You must be 18 or older to post on this site.

>>12920149
This guy posted the solution, a shorter version of my explanation: >>12920134
They are different symbols with different meanings is all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:37:24 No.12920159 Report

Quoted By: >>12920170

>>12920143
ISO Was your argument btw, not mine. See >>12919313

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:41:05 No.12920170 Report

Quoted By: >>12920176 >>12920250

>>12920159
Then your reply doesn't make any sense. You're really just badly trolling and samefagging at this point.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 13:44:49 No.12920176 Report

Quoted By: >>12920277

>>12920158
yes, the answer for both is 9...
This guy posted the solution >>12915934

>>12920170
>I disowned that "earliest" ISO post when it was used against me.
>I am OP.
ok

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO makes no difference.jpg, 120KiB, 1708x522

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 14:19:18 No.12920250 Report

Quoted By: >>12920277

>>12920158
>>12920170
The answer is 9 for both.
Recent additions to ISO are still irrelevant, especially considering how old that 6÷2(1+2) meme is.
Everyone understands the notation difference you're jerking off about and we've all been using that feature on our graphics calculator for the past 20 years.

But the answer doesn't suddenly change.
You're going to have to wait for at least another decade or so before any of this trickles down into the real world.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 14:28:46 No.12920277 Report

Quoted By: >>12920293

>>12920176
Different symbols, different meanings. Your feelings don't change that.
>>I disowned that "earliest" ISO post when it was used against me.
What? It was never used "against me". It just confirms what I said. Check out the older versions if you want, the symbol was used like that before.

>>12920250
>Everyone understands the notation difference
Then why are you arguing?
>But the answer doesn't suddenly change
Never claimed it did suddenly change.
>before any of this trickles down into the real world.
It's literally in OP's pic. It's not new.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 14:33:09 No.12920293 Report

Quoted By: >>12920335

>>12920277
answer is 9 for both
agreed
><

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 14:42:15 No.12920335 Report

Quoted By: >>12920350

>>12920293
>answer is 9 for both
No, as explained further up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 14:43:33 No.12920340 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
Who gives a shit. Syntax is arbitrary anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 14:45:56 No.12920350 Report

Quoted By: >>12920472

>>12920335
I'm going with google.
you're just teenage edgelord schizzo troll.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 15:26:34 No.12920472 Report

Quoted By: >>12920527 >>12920786

>>12920350
>I'm going with google.
lol, of course you do. Never think for yourself. Let others do the thinking for you.
Obviously, Google adjusts their features to how people use them. And you don't really think us experts use them, do you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 15:43:23 No.12920527 Report

Quoted By: >>12920786

>>12920472
>I'm just a teenage edgelord schizzo troll.
when change trickles thru on google, then recent ISO additions will become commonplace.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 16:34:35 No.12920786 Report

Quoted By: >>12920805 >>12920820 >>12920823

>>12920527
>when change trickles thru on google,
You're an idiot. Learn to read.
>>12920472
>Google adjusts their features to how people use them.
>>I'm just a teenage edgelord schizzo troll.
>posts some retarded claim
>doesn't pose any arguments
>doesn't explain
>doesn't post any source
>noooo you're trolling!!1
Then why are you still replying?
>because I know you're right, since you've posted both your reasoning, etymology and a source but I want to save face by swearing at you for no reason
Ah yes, makes sense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 16:38:20 No.12920805 Report

Quoted By: >>12920931

>>12920786
>>Everyone understands the notation difference you're jerking off about and we've all been using that feature on our graphics calculator for the past 20 years.
before you were sperm in your dad's nutsack.
Thanks for confirming your edgelord psychosis OCD.
just can't help yourself.
cheers

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 16:42:05 No.12920820 Report

Quoted By: >>12920931

>>12920786
Get help, you're broken.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 16:43:07 No.12920823 Report

Quoted By: >>12920931

>>12920786
>>doesn't post any source
source for what?
wtf are you babbling on about?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 17:10:54 No.12920931 Report

Quoted By: >>12920960 >>12920966

>>12920805
That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. If you understand it, why are you arguing?

>>12920820
How so, samefag?

>>12920823
>it was used like I say in physics journals

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 17:19:31 No.12920960 Report

Quoted By: >>12921833

>>12920931
you're a meth-addict, bro!!

the link WAS provided to the article stating what notation journals use.... and it ain't yours.

you must of missed everything whilst pulling on your billie, bruh!! get help.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 17:20:54 No.12920966 Report

Quoted By: >>12921833

>>12920931
meth addict, of course.
now I get it.
get help.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 17:25:38 No.12920987 Report

Quoted By: >>12923347 >>12925152

>>12900583
This is fake right?
Euler did a ton of stuff with i.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 17:36:53 No.12921034 Report

Quoted By: >>12924204

>>12911753
Division and multiplication have equal precedence, you go left to right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 20:38:35 No.12921697 Report

Quoted By:

>>12918844
*thirth

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 21:18:56 No.12921833 Report

Quoted By: >>12922083 >>12922088

>>12920960
>the link WAS provided to the article stating what notation journals use
Link a paper.
>hurr durrr
Grow up. Also, I posted a link showing I'm right so...

>>12920966
Pathetic samefag. Can't do anything but swear. Probably underage. You know you have to be 18 or older to post on this site, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 21:29:19 No.12921859 Report

Quoted By: >>12927031

>>12904465
no one does that
>inb4 "brainlet I was doing calculus in middle school"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 21:30:49 No.12921863 Report

Quoted By: >>12921867

>>12900569
SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP SHUT THE FUCK UP nobody cares you fucking retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 21:31:51 No.12921867 Report

Quoted By:

>>12921863
why do people keep making threads like this i'm starting to think this is some sort of a psyop

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 22:38:22 No.12922083 Report

Quoted By: >>12923681

>>12921833
A citations in footnotes
Fuck off ya fake
Do it yourself

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 22:40:19 No.12922088 Report

Quoted By: >>12923681

>>12921833
Fried brain

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 22:47:49 No.12922111 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
Answer is 9

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Apr 2021 22:52:02 No.12922131 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
OP is a faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 04:57:57 No.12923347 Report

Quoted By:

>>12920987
This is a different i

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 05:06:24 No.12923375 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900583
/sci/ way: $\left(x+\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}y\right)\left(x+\frac{1-i\sqrt{3}}{2}y\right)$

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 07:26:09 No.12923681 Report

Quoted By: >>12924050

>>12922083
>>12922088
Why are you still samefagging?
I posted a source. You can do the same if you claim there are multiple physics paper using it. But you won't, since you know you're wrong.
Instead, swearing is all you got. Shameful display.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 08:17:29 No.12923782 Report

Quoted By: >>12923913

>>12900929
>>12900959
>That depends. Are you asking 6/(2x) or (6/2)x
Division is a far more complicated operation than multiplication so as a general rule you would do it last. Writing anything in a denominator is a pretty big deal. Realistically this kind of ambiguity literally never happens. Everything in math is created to be as straightforward and simple to write as possible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 08:37:07 No.12923816 Report

Quoted By:

>>12906256
You're essentially made of nothing but shit, anon. I'll make this easy for the 9 posters ITT. Dividing is a task that could potentially take you infinite time to complete vs adding a number, to itself, n times. This ambiguity never occurs in the real world because you can choose the simpler option in every single case so wondering about which one to do first doesn't occur to anyone because no one's out here wondering if people are gonna ask them to do some ridiculous task lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 08:51:08 No.12923835 Report

Quoted By:

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mixed_division_and_multiplication
>For example, the manuscript submission instructions for the Physical Review journals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division with a slash, and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifshitz and the Feynman Lectures on Physics
this is NOT an entry from any of these above mentioned "exceptions"...
>exceptions?.....
All this is written under the topic "Special cases"...
wiki listed this under "Special cases"... lmao
>However, in some of the academic literature
lmao, its not even universal within that one niche market.

this is not an "everyone" knows this when reading this specific journal "Special case exception"..
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6/2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6÷2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
google "6/2(1+2) solution" <OR> google "6÷2(1+2) solution"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 08:58:27 No.12923844 Report

Quoted By:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mixed_division_and_multiplication
>For example, the manuscript submission instructions for the Physical Review journals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division with a slash, and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifshitz and the Feynman Lectures on Physics
this is NOT an entry from any of these above mentioned "exceptions"...
>exceptions?.....
All this is written under the topic "Special cases"...
wiki listed this under "Special cases"... lmao
>However, in some of the academic literature
lmao, its not even universal within that one niche market.

this is not an "everyone" knows this when reading this specific journal "Special case exception"..
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6/2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6÷2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
google "6/2(1+2) solution" <OR> google "6÷2(1+2) solution"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 09:30:00 No.12923913 Report

Quoted By:

>>12923782
>Division is a far more complicated operation than multiplication
lolno
You take the multiplicative inverse element which is guaranteed to exist for b != 0 and multiply.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 10:00:02 No.12923950 Report

Quoted By: >>12923983 >>12924050 >>12924112 >>12924496

[[[Mixed division and multiplication]]]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mixed_division_and_multiplication
>However, in some of the academic literature
>However, in some of the academic literature
>However, in some of the academic literature, multiplication denoted by juxtaposition (also known as implied multiplication) is interpreted as having higher precedence than division, so that 1 ÷ 2x equals 1 ÷ (2x), not (1 ÷ 2)x.

>For example, the manuscript submission instructions for the Physical Review journals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division with a slash,
>so that 1 ÷ 2x equals 1 ÷ (2x), not (1 ÷ 2)x.
>so that 1 ÷ 2x equals 1 ÷ (2x), not (1 ÷ 2)x.

[However, in some of the academic literature]
[However, in some of the academic literature]
>and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifshitz and the Feynman Lectures on Physics

this is NOT an entry from any of these above mentioned "exceptions"...
>exceptions?.....
All this is written under the topic "Special cases"...
wiki listed this under "Special cases"... lmao
lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao
>However, in some of the academic literature
lmao, its not even universal within that one niche market.

SO WHAT IS THE ANSWER?
this is not an "everyone" knows this when reading this specific journal "Special case exception"..
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6/2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
this is why EVERY single webpage and youtube video solving 6÷2(1+2), says the answer is 9.
google "6/2(1+2) solution" <OR> google "6÷2(1+2) solution"

The solution is 9.

LMAO, according to wiki
>1 ÷ 2x equals 1 ÷ (2x), not (1 ÷ 2)x.
is nothing more than an agreed to way for everyone to publish shit without confusion by all agreeing to the same notation style without confusing errors being introduced by accident...
IT ISN'T WORTH FUCKING ANYTHING!!!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 10:21:01 No.12923983 Report

Quoted By: >>12923986 >>12924050 >>12924112

>>12923950
Woah calm down there schizo
Bait threads like this need trigger warning apparently

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 10:22:50 No.12923986 Report

Quoted By: >>12923993 >>12924160 >>12924216

>>12923983
***trigger warning*** MAY DRIVE RETARD TO MENTAL INSANITY

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 10:26:52 No.12923993 Report

Quoted By:

>>12923986
Thanks, but should be on the top really.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Mathematician Explains 6÷ (...).jpg, 113KiB, 1347x596

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 10:50:52 No.12924050 Report

Quoted By: >>12924112

>>12900569 WE HAVE AN ANSWER
>>12923681
>I posted a source
You posted a typesetting for printing presses that expired in 1917.
The answer is >>12923950
wtf!!! is this >>12923983 you?
>I was WRONG the whole time, so now I get snotty!!
EXPLAINED BY A MATHEMATICIAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URcUvFIUIhQ

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 11:17:01 No.12924090 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900583
i-i=1
Well time to abandon your entire group structure

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 11:25:34 No.12924112 Report

Quoted By: >>12924160 >>12924192

>>12924050
>You posted a typesetting for printing presses that expired in 1917.
lol no, I didn't. Are you high or something?
>The answer is >>12923950
Why are you still samefagging this hard?
>EXPLAINED BY A MATHEMATICIAN
>MindYourDecisions pajeet bait channel
Anon, he's babbling about PEMDAS etc., which is a babby tool for dumb American kids and not the point here at all. You don't need it. He does not explain the difference between the symbols / and ÷ and just assumes them to mean the same. His explanation is correct, but just applies to /. It has nothing to do with order of operations. You only need the simple fact that alle operators like +, -, *, / are binary operators operating on the objects irevtly to the left and right of them, while ÷ is an abbreviated fraction line separating everything on the left from everything on the right.
>wtf!!! is this >>12923983 you?
I'm everyone in this thread! Out to get you! You looked behind you, but not above! Schizo time!

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO divide left by right.jpg, 92KiB, 880x444

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 11:57:43 No.12924160 Report

Quoted By: >>12924216 >>12924496

>>12924112
>He does not explain the difference between the symbols / and ÷ and just assumes them to mean the same
YES he does know the difference..
HE is a mathematician, you are not.
HE said after 3mins into it that it was about a "division" sign, even had a ÷ in his video. lol.
and said the same >>12917567 >>12915723 as YOU said.
"divide entire product on the left BY the entire product on the right"..
special rule l ÷ r
divide l by r
exact same words as yours.
exact same words as yours.
exact same words as yours.
exact same words as yours.
you ramble a bunch of nothings in attempt to win an argument using deception.
>>12924112
>I'm everyone in this thread! Out to get you!
sorry, you must be >>12923986, instead.
you are a loser who even tries to lie to win..

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO BETTER PIC.jpg, 142KiB, 957x538

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:13:35 No.12924192 Report

Quoted By: >>12924216

>>12924112
Here is a better picture in case you think it was someone other than you whom lies to win.
Maybe you should try watching a video before lying about its contents.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:21:06 No.12924204 Report

Quoted By:

>>12921034
I don't know how people all over the internet don't know this shit that you get taught in the first few years of education.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:25:37 No.12924216 Report

Quoted By: >>12924242 >>12924251 >>12924271

>>12924160
>YES he does know the difference..
He doesn't talk about it in the video.
>HE is a mathematician
No, he's not. He does entertainment videos that sometimes involve little math puzzles.
>you are not.
Well, I actually am doing my (math) PhD currently in Europe, top university in central, on the topic of using the anti-deSitter/conformal field theory symmetry for efficient quantum formulations (read functional spaces) of hierarchical tensor networks. What are your credentials?
>HE said after 3mins into it that it was about a "division" sign, even had a ÷ in his video. lol.
Yes, as I said, he doesn't mention the difference between / and ÷ and isn't aware of it. "lol"
>you ramble a bunch of nothings
No, I posted my argument from etymology and the difference between / and the obelus, providing a direct source for it, while you argue with a YouTube pajeet.
> in attempt to win an argument
No, you can't win an argument. I'm not surprised you don't know that though.
>sorry, you must be >>12923986, instead
As I said, I'm everyone here. Even you!
>you are a loser who even tries to lie to win..
Where have I lied? I'm not the one samefagging this hard here to make a point. I'm also not the one swearing to "win an argument" here. You are.

>>12924192
lmao, that pic shows exactly what I said. What's even your point?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:37:08 No.12924242 Report

Quoted By: >>12924268

>>12924216
Yes, he talked exactly about it in the video
Yes, he is a mathematician.
Yes, you are a lying turd
Yes, everything on the left divide everything on the right
Yes, same answer = 1, as you resulted.

also:
Yes, that pic shows exactly what you said when using the same method you use.

now trying every different bullshit angle you can to get away with getting caught.
YOU ARE A LIAR NOW SQUIRMING LIKE THE PATHETIC WORM YOU ARE.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:39:31 No.12924251 Report

Quoted By: >>12924268

>>12924216
liar liar pants on fire

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:44:58 No.12924268 Report

Quoted By: >>12924281 >>12924287

>>12924242
>Yes, he is a mathematician.
No, he is not. Show me a single paper he wrote.
>Yes, you are a lying turd
Where did I lie?
>Yes, everything on the left divide everything on the right
Like I said from the beginning, thanks for finally admitting I am right.
>now trying every different bullshit angle you can to get away with getting caught
Getting caught wihh what?
>YOU ARE A LIAR
Where did I lie?

>more swearing
You need to be 18 or older to post on this site.

>>12924251
Samefag, see above.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:45:58 No.12924271 Report

Quoted By: >>12924411

>>12924216
This anon is actually a 13yo fat lard in moms basement surrounded by hentai posters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:47:37 No.12924281 Report

Quoted By: >>12924411

>>12924268
>watch me squirm like a worm to try & sound important.
you are an irrelevant bullshit artist.
good riddance.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:49:51 No.12924287 Report

Quoted By: >>12924411

>>12924268
sorry, your shit got tossed in 1917.
only needed now to stop other idiots like you from misreading journals.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 12:55:00 No.12924313 Report

Quoted By: >>12924422 >>12925042

>>12901668
This. What my teatcher told me in I was in school was that whenever there's multiplication and division in the same expression, you solve whatever comes first of them two. Simple as that. But, of course, to some people here, something like this being solved this much easy is worst than dying to them. It's like they want to force everybody else to overthink it, even though they don't demonstrate a similar behavior when it comes to other problems, not even if those problems have more than one form of resolution. But with this problem specifically, IT HAS TO BE THEIR WAY AND THEIR WAY ONLY. It's clear that this expression is a /sci/ meme, so fundamentally it works differently now, in a senseless way or not, doesn't matter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:01:28 No.12924336 Report

Quoted By:

>>12910765
>i don't know if spoilers work on /sci/
lol I also don't remember if they do, so:
[spoiler:lit]Test[/spoiler:lit]

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1617069936549.jpg, 83KiB, 1041x602

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:11:47 No.12924385 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900597
Hmm...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:17:16 No.12924411 Report

Quoted By: >>12924458

>>12924271
>>12924281
>more swearing
Not making a good case for yourself here.

>>12924287
>misreading journals
Which journals?
>sorry, your shit got tossed in 1917.
You didn't understand what he was saying, and no, it obviously wasn't completely tossed (I never even doubted that). See for example the source I posted (to which you said "2019?? New fad! Don't follow!").
So, at which point will you just admit I was right? I posted a source, you posted a YouTube video that confirmed the same thing, I argued for why it's used the way it is, how much more do you need?

Also still samefagging this hard is really pathetic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:19:15 No.12924422 Report

Quoted By: >>12925399

>>12924313
>IT HAS TO BE THEIR WAY AND THEIR WAY ONLY.
there is no way
it is ambiguous
without context you have no idea what the author meant
plugging your ears while chanting "left to right" does not bring you closer to the mindset of the author
you can not invent a disambiguation you do not know for sure is the right one

there is no solution
it is as meaningless as "+/5=+(2"

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:29:58 No.12924458 Report

Quoted By: >>12924478

>>12924411
you're a self-taught bullshit artist trolling your own fantastical psychosis ego trip.
GO AWAY

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:36:54 No.12924478 Report

Quoted By: >>12924495

>>12924458
That doesn't even make sense. Your "source" agrees with mine and both support my point.
It's obvious you're trolling, but you really need to get better at maintaining the facade of being reasonable instead of posting schizo garbage and making it seem like you're three people.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:42:59 No.12924495 Report

Quoted By: >>12924515

>>12924478
ISO introduces new standards all the time that are eventuality introduced into the party-member schooling systems over time and take root thus changing curriculum as it has been so for decades.

when my local primary and high-schools and university care less about paying attention to even beginning to alter standardized curriculum in their respective classrooms is when I'll maybe start to give a shit.
GO AWAY

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:43:55 No.12924496 Report

Quoted By: >>12924511 >>12924519 >>12924540

>>12923950
>>12924160
>exact same words as yours.
>exact same words as yours.
>exact same words as yours.
>exact same words as yours.

How is it possible that these threads always bring out the inner schizo in these people? We REALLY do need a trigger warning.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:48:57 No.12924511 Report

Quoted By:

>>12924496
>I just kicked in the teeth with the reality of slow moving academic changes over time & realize a published ISO paper is not the same as universities worldwide already accepting & teaching recommended changes.
you're a self-taught bullshit artist trolling your own fantastical psychosis ego trip.
GO AWAY

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:49:52 No.12924515 Report

Quoted By: >>12924519

>>12924495
All of what you said there is completely irrelevant to the point that I was right, you posted something agreeing with me, and you're still butthurt about noticing you've been btfo'd by yourself.
You also lied several times
>you liar
>that pajeet is a mathematician
>you're not
>you're self-taught
>etc
and cringely samefagged hard.
You're not saving face by RRREEEEEEing instead of admitting you made a small mistake. It's no big deal, really, and would make you a better man.
I still suspect you to be underaged, btw.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 13:51:26 No.12924519 Report

Quoted By: >>12924540 >>12926806

>>12924496
>>12924515
>>12924496
>I was just kicked in the teeth with the reality of slow moving academic changes over time & realize a published ISO paper is not the same as universities worldwide already accepting & teaching recommended changes.
you're a self-taught bullshit artist trolling your own fantastical psychosis ego trip.
GO AWAY

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 14:00:02 No.12924540 Report

Quoted By: >>12924544

>>12924519
>posting this three times
Take your meds. I'm not >>12924496 but agree with him. Nothing you say says in any way that I was wrong or that you were right. Just admit it, and be a better man instead of throwing this pathetic tantrum on a Mongolian underground basket-weaving forum.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 14:01:07 No.12924544 Report

Quoted By: >>12924626

>>12924540
ISO standards is one of those bodies relevant many industries including academic bodies but there are no laws enforcing any of it and individual academic bodies in whatever country decide what they teach for themselves.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 14:19:21 No.12924579 Report

Quoted By: >>12924626 >>12929153

>>12900569
Fucking idiots in this thread think ISO publishes a paper and it becomes law.
Something published in 2019 would of hardly had time to already been discussed enough to contemplate changes to any curriculum.

They may or may not even work it into standard education in any country little less every country.

We'll all have to wait and see if ISO 80000-2 recommendations is given a warm reception or just outright ignored.
only time will tell.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 14:49:31 No.12924626 Report

Quoted By:

>>12924544
Yes. And?
>>12924579
>Fucking idiots in this thread think ISO publishes a paper and it becomes law.
Who?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 16:49:40 No.12925042 Report

Quoted By: >>12925399

>>12924313
dude omg if you have to have 1 thing in your life that you have to do in the absolute least complicated way everytime then how are you going to figure anything else out in life. Allow yourself to think about why somebody would seemingly choose to do something that appears to overcomplicate a situation. If at first glance that decision appears irrational and they do it anyways then there was a reason for that. Like, I don't even know what to say really. You really fucking think people are doing stupid shit for no reason, just to make your life difficult? Like, you got to the point where you can read from left to right and that's that? You're never going to need to think any harder than that? I guess you're just done.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 119710503_123078736194888_617654 (...).png, 400KiB, 695x717

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 17:02:30 No.12925107 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900958
the correct answer is: 6/23

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO THD8mc2.jpg, 110KiB, 762x644

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 17:17:30 No.12925152 Report

Quoted By: >>12927308

>>12900731
>>12901413
>>12904530
>>12910534
>>12920987

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 18:08:51 No.12925399 Report

Quoted By: >>12926354

>>12924422
I fail to see any ambiguity in that expression. "Without context you have no idea what the author meant", what?! It's just a mathematical expression, what possible contexts would it be necessary if no just straight up solving the fucking thing. "The context" you say can only be the knowledge (of algebraic expressions, to add, subtract, multiplicate and divide) and the ability someone has to have. The "author" of this problem cannot change these fundamental rules. And the rule is that when there's multiplication and division, it's solved from left to right (simply whatever comes first). It's a mathematical rule and it makes total sense. It's not at all ambiguous because he can't "force a context", if he did he'd be violating a rule thus nullifying the expression.

>>12925042
I agree with you, COMPLETELY. What I meant in my post (and I should've been specific, so thanks for calling me out) is that that problem specifically is too "politicized", to the point where no rational discussion about it can occur without it spiraling down into a nonsensical overload of "you're way (PEMDAS) is wrong and mine is right." But, YES, I do hold the belief that that problem is shit easy to solve and all the other takes about it only exist because it used to be solved differently in the past. Obselete now. So in this particular problem, all the stress to me seems unnecessary, especialy here where this very topic, I believe, cannot be discussed properly. HOWEVER, I DO NOT discourage anyone of viewing the resolution to problems in math in as many ways as there are, in fact this is one of the reasons why I like math. I love how, in math, you can always prove something to be true through numerous other principles.

With this one, if an not using an outdated method, the answer is always a concrete 9.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 21:26:15 No.12926354 Report

Quoted By: >>12926744

>>12925399
>what possible contexts would it be necessary if no just straight up solving the fucking thing.
so you think everything has a solution (even if the answer is "no solution") whatever "solution" would mean and that mathematics is perfect and never a complete description of anything?
>And the rule is that when there's multiplication and division, it's solved from left to right
there is absolutely no such rule for multiplication/division.
you might state that you use it in your writings, but you can not assume other authors have done the same.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO images (2).jpg, 30KiB, 521x589

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 22:55:41 No.12926744 Report

Quoted By: >>12926996

>>12926354
>so you think everything has a solution
What fuck are you talking about? I literally never said this? Of course there are no-solution problems that, btw, extend beyond the realm of mathematics, and at no point whatsoever I said otherwise. But I did say that in the problem at hand does have a solution (9).

>there is absolutely no such rule for multiplication/division
Now this is too much, I've had it. Am I arguing with a fucking kid or what?

Familiarize yourself with ORDER OF MOTHERFUCKING OPERATIONS.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 23:13:41 No.12926806 Report

Quoted By:

>>12924519
Take your meds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 23:52:39 No.12926996 Report

Quoted By: >>12927057

>>12926744
order of operations only applies if you are using notation without ambiguities
linear notation (like calculator notation) in a non-linear context (like OPs post) is ambiguous, and the relations here are all binary relations.
(linear as in one-dimensional text, without stacked fractions and what not).
Since multiplication and division have the same precedence, if you are using single-line notation you better make damn sure there is only one result from parse it using the precedence from orders of operations.
OP has two results so it is ambiguous garbage.

Exponents have as a similar issue
$<br />{(e^x)}^2 = e^{2x} \qquad e^{(x^2)}<br />$

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1456985396416.jpg, 76KiB, 528x565

Anonymous Sun 04 Apr 2021 23:59:44 No.12927031 Report

Quoted By:

>>12921859
Found the "special" ed kid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 00:08:30 No.12927057 Report

Quoted By: >>12927308

>>12926996
>OP has two results so it is ambiguous garbage
He has two results because the operators are different.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 01:23:14 No.12927308 Report

Quoted By: >>12928293 >>12928352

>>12927057
>>12925152

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 06:38:15 No.12928293 Report

Quoted By:

>>12927308
That pic is unambiguously wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 06:55:48 No.12928352 Report

Quoted By: >>12928407 >>12929104 >>12929153

>>12927308
lmao, the sheer shit state of mathematics these days is classic.
Lets demote the entire math faculty below the professional status of babbling bong tokers.
I recommend we all abandon this shit thread before the next wave of schizzos tell you all about what that qualified math teacher was "really" doing there!!

Give up, schizos got to schiz.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 07:19:12 No.12928407 Report

Quoted By: >>12929104 >>12929153

>>12928352
>old versus new
schizos are always flogging a dead horse.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 11:02:42 No.12929104 Report

Quoted By:

>>12928352
>>12928407
>We'll all have to wait and see if ISO 80000-2 recommendations is given a warm reception or just outright ignored.
>only time will tell.
The next generation of self-taught fat lards in moms basement will be surrounded by hentai posters & jerking off to implied multiplication climax-shrieking "worship ISO standards or take your meds".

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 11:16:42 No.12929153 Report

Quoted By: >>12929461 >>12929495 >>12930599

>>12924579
>>12928352
>>12928407
>We'll all have to wait and see if ISO 80000-2 recommendations is given a warm reception or just outright ignored.
>only time will tell.
The next generation of self-taught fat lards in moms basement will be surrounded by hentai posters & jerking off to implied multiplication climax-shrieking "worship ISO standards or take your meds".

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:16:58 No.12929461 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929153
>"worship ISO standards or take your meds".
Who are you quoting? Nobody says that. You're just schizoid in general. Not even shitting around here. Your posting style is absolutely schizotypical.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:25:40 No.12929495 Report

Quoted By: >>12930159

>>12929153
just had to overdo it, well done.
now its next gen all fucking night, again.

El Arcón

El Arcón Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:26:12 No.12929498 Report

Quoted By: >>12929565

Maybe they use different division symbols to specify if the parentheses are multiplied by a fraction or if the parenthesis are on the bottom. The dot/dot notation means the parenthesis on the bottom and the slash is a fraction out front. That seems ok to me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:47:41 No.12929565 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929498
This.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 14:37:35 No.12929729 Report

Quoted By:

PEMDAS = P, then E, then M & D from left to right, then A & S from left to right.

Step 1, parenthesis - (1+2) = 3

Step 2, from left to right complete all multiplication and division operations - 6/2 = 3, then 3*3 = 9

Step 3, ???

Step 4, realize you already found the answer, 9

Step 5, profit

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO shit teaching.jpg, 122KiB, 762x644

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 16:34:12 No.12930159 Report

Quoted By: >>12930232 >>12931026

>>12929495
Me?
As if a schizo needs a reason to schiz!!
It is inevitable ISO 80000-2 recommendations will be implemented so "/' and "÷" will take their rightful place as the change needed to replace PEMDAS shite.

A far superior method for children to learn juxtaposition.
PEJMDAS is the future whether any of us like it or not.
using "/' and "÷" to facilitate this is literally a genius method to get kids to both understand and remember it with ease.
Just take a look at the pic and laugh at how shit they're doing without it, they should be laughed at.
No longer is the answer 9 in all cases with only an exception if an alternate order to PEMDAS is specified.
PEMDAS is dead, long live the king.. PEJMDAS is now king... long live the king.

Honestly if both those inate retardation sandwiches hadn't been such a massive faggot duo on /x/ that whole time I would of just helped them in their posts instead of turding all over their obnoxious self-exalted ego driven wankfest psychosis.

Those two dickheads deserve every bit of trolling they get.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO industry standard.jpg, 161KiB, 1137x447

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 16:56:05 No.12930232 Report

Quoted By: >>12931026

>>12930159
truly peace on Earth, kek!!

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO pepe approves.gif, 93KiB, 250x240

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 18:33:33 No.12930599 Report

Quoted By:

>>12929153
>even brighter horizons of condescending fuckery, plus hentai?
/sci/ will never leave moms basement!!
sci tards, lmao!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 18:34:40 No.12930606 Report

Quoted By:

I admit, I can't do math beyond an average 10 year old's level.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 20:20:13 No.12931026 Report

Quoted By: >>12931098

>>12930232
Who the hell owns four calculators?

>>12930159
>I'm not schizo, I'm trolling!!1

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 20:29:30 No.12931098 Report

Quoted By: >>12931246

>>12931026
Everyone who owns four calculators will troll the fuck out of 4channel.org/sci/, bruh!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 20:50:22 No.12931246 Report

Quoted By: >>12931294

>>12931098
>I'm only acting retarded hurrrrr

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 20:57:01 No.12931294 Report

Quoted By: >>12932977 >>12933944

>>12931246
>ha ha you actually need to fake it hurrrrr

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 05 Apr 2021 23:13:19 No.12931963 Report

Quoted By:

>sci getting filtered by BODMAS
why am I not surprised

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 03:27:21 No.12932977 Report

Quoted By: >>12933944

>>12931294
>that realization others think you come here to enrich your intellect.
I agree, trolling the utter fuck out of /sci/ faggots is the only worthwhile enjoyment this place has to offer.
especially those 2 little /x/ pricks, hunt them down & piss on their pompous little shit 4 brains.
they both deserve full-servicing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 09:50:52 No.12933944 Report

Quoted By: >>12934005 >>12936820 >>12936973

>>12931294
>>12932977
Samefag.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO yes, yes I'm everyone, bruh!!.jpg, 97KiB, 1050x340

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 10:19:35 No.12934005 Report

Quoted By: >>12934360 >>12934615 >>12936029 >>12936549 >>12936783

>>12933944
I always knew /sci/ was way worse than facebook.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 10:21:24 No.12934008 Report

Quoted By: >>12934656

jeez, inspect element is hard to have fun with.
see how long it takes him!!

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO no, no I'm Spartacus, m8!!.jpg, 148KiB, 972x596

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 13:03:21 No.12934360 Report

Quoted By: >>12934615 >>12936029 >>12936549 >>12936783

>>12934005
I always knew facebook was way better than /sci/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 14:22:44 No.12934615 Report

Quoted By: >>12934631 >>12936820 >>12936973

>>12934005
>>12934360
I have mental issues and difficulties dealing with my homosexual impulses.
My Doctor tells me I should endeavor to not blame others for my own personal insecurities.
I apologize for my behavior, and will try to contain my homosexual lust for fellow board posters.
I am truly sorry.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 14:27:24 No.12934631 Report

Quoted By:

>>12934615
kys

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 14:36:49 No.12934656 Report

Quoted By:

>>12934008
>inspect element
What the fuck are you talking about you unintelligent nongenius retarded fucking trash

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 15:38:57 No.12934909 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
The problem is that when you see the parentheses you instantly think you can just distribute the two and make it 6, but no. You have to follow the order of operations, there's a hidden multiplication sign in there.

6/2(1+2)=
6/2*(1+2)=
6/2*3= //This is the important part, you now have two operations of equal priority, so you do them left to right
3*3=
9

This is better illustrated if you switch the multiplication and division with addition and subtraction

6-2+(1+2)=
6-2+3=
4+3=
7

Note that had you done the addition before the subtraction, you'd get 1, but that's WRONG and RETARDED

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 20:22:58 No.12936029 Report

Quoted By: >>12936344

>>12934005
>>12934360
It's blatantly obvious you're a phone poster.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 21:30:43 No.12936344 Report

Quoted By: >>12936549

>>12936029
I'm not those anons.
They just posted proof, it looks to me more like zoom not mobile and you confessed mental problems. You're the one who needs help, prove you're not the mental patient.
Or even better, stop being a loser and shut up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 22:12:12 No.12936549 Report

Quoted By: >>12936783 >>12936820 >>12936973

>>12936344
>>12934005
>>12934360
Samefag.
>what is incognito mode

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2021-04-07 070356.jpg, 163KiB, 1366x768

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 23:09:11 No.12936783 Report

Quoted By:

>>12934005
>>12934360
>>12936549
samefag

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ube.jpg, 120KiB, 768x495

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 23:11:56 No.12936796 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 23:16:45 No.12936820 Report

Quoted By: >>12937079

>>12933944
>>12934615
>>12936549
samefag

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO dfg.png, 1KiB, 179x141

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 23:34:12 No.12936890 Report

Quoted By: >>12936973

>>12912165
No, the order literally doesn't matter.

How do you not know this? Do it any way and it's 9. Any other answer is because you're too stupid to resolve the brackets first.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO istockphoto-841679942-612x612.jpg, 23KiB, 612x408

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 23:35:53 No.12936896 Report

Quoted By: >>12936973

>>12914709
But doing them in any order yields the same result.

Can you provide an example of where not doing them left to right gives the wrong answer?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 06 Apr 2021 23:51:11 No.12936973 Report

Quoted By: >>12937079

>>12933944
>>12934615
>>12936549
>>12936890
>>12936896
samefag

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 00:22:47 No.12937079 Report

Quoted By: >>12937120 >>12938604

>>12936820
>>12936973
Yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 00:35:50 No.12937120 Report

Quoted By: >>12937123

>>12937079
ok.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 00:37:20 No.12937123 Report

Quoted By:

>>12937120
u 2?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2021-04-07 sci - ther (...).png, 102KiB, 745x1609

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 00:44:20 No.12937152 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2021-04-07 sci - ther (...).png, 102KiB, 745x1609

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 01:08:29 No.12937224 Report

Quoted By: >>12938442

a faggot being treated for mental illness trolls this board getting sexually aroused and blames us for it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 01:34:38 No.12937308 Report

Quoted By:

PEMDAS = 9
PEJMDAS = 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 02:08:19 No.12937447 Report

Quoted By:

>>12900569
5

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 07:26:57 No.12938442 Report

Quoted By: >>12938604

>>12937224
>I opened another window in incognito mode
wow

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 07 Apr 2021 08:51:07 No.12938604 Report

Quoted By:

>>12938442
This post here >>12937079 is yours.
Whatever you're on about is irrelevant.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches