>>12906499>No, you do not know what you're talking about, CE LITERALLY creates the systems you are working with. Your entire life is dedicated just to understand a fraction of how they work, how could you honestly claim CS is equivalent in any way?This is the biggest dunning Kruger I’ve ever read. This is the whole “EE/CE act like they own computing tech because they study parts of it.” You literally aren’t aware that you study just a fraction of computer design, and that most of the work has been done by people smarter than you way before you’re born. Your work is literally just repeating the well known designs people way before you, CE, EE, math, physics, CS, etc.. thought about decades before you entered.
>You learn a language and input data given to you by people who can actually thinkFor the second time, I’m not a CS major. Hell, I think most CS programs are brainlet shit. But I don’t think CE’s are nearly as smart as they advertise on this board, and they’re certainly not smarter than codemonkeys on average en masse. They are application specific codemonkeys, with their “language and data” being at best the highest of low level (HDL’s and bios microcode) or at the same level with C++.
>b-but what about my design and research jobs at hardware places like AMD and nvidia???Those people are looking for non brainlets in any major related to computing. You can go to the AMD site. Their circuit design jobs prefer EE, while their automated design verification prefer CS. They don’t care if you’re CS or EE / CE if you want to do tightly coupled CPU research and microprocessing for their research intern position.
Nobody gives a flying fuck about your major. If you’re a brainlet, it’ll show. If you’re not, people will hire you. This isn’t civil eng where you need a civ eng PE. This is computing tech. You sound like a sophomore who barely knows what he’s doing.
