>>12899842This is not a troll you can be sure of that.
>lol dude don't you even know how influential cryptography was in the battle of britain?? xDDSource?
>the US crushed everyone in mass productionYeah, they also had much more land and resources and like 4 times the population.
>US corporations built some of the wonderfully efficient factories the Germans usedSo? Just goes to show that the industrialists like Ford were quite fond of Hitler and that the US was maneuvered into the war by a very specific group of (((people)))
>Much of German logistics actually relied on horsedrawn cartsHm gee I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that Germany couldn't get oil since most countries wouldn't trade with them and they had very little natural resources?
>strategicallyAh you mean like bombing the shit out of every city with more than 20k inhabitants?
>B-29Sure, good aircraft, although officially the cost for the R&D was higher than for the Manhatten project so take that as you will.
And don't even try to pin the German aircraft as underperforming or whatever. The Messerschmitt jets are nothing but legendary.
>soviet deep battle doctrineSource?
It's not a secret that the US army still uses Blitzkrieg tactic and have one mg per squad just like the Wehrmacht among many other things.
Yet I'm pretty sure they don't use commie tactics ...
