/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12890189

451KiB, 1920x1124, 1920px-Basal_ganglia_and_related_structures_(2).svg.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 12:32:20 2021 No.12890189 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12890258 >>12890265 >>12891156 >>12891254 >>12892478 >>12892642

>>>/g/80838080
>>>/g/80838088
>>>/g/80838097
>>>/g/80838107
>>>/g/80838112
>>>/g/80838123
Is he right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 2021 12:51:07 No.12890242 Report

Quoted By:

It sounds reasonable to me

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 2021 12:58:01 No.12890258 Report

Quoted By:

>>12890189
Cool hypothesis, but does the brain really have such an insane amount of computing power?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 2021 13:01:11 No.12890265 Report

Quoted By:

>>12890189
idk by the 3rd post its clear he's trying too hard. I agree the brain isn't simply a neural net but somewhere, it definitely acts like one. (see training, practice, pattern recognition) Im not sure we really understand the true mechanisms of how the brain actually functions. It could also be that neurons are so efficient that it doesn't matter how slow they are. I mean shit, the fastest human reaction time is still two orders of magnitude slower than nerve signal speed. Its not unreasonable that the brain is efficient IMO.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 2021 13:02:56 No.12890267 Report

Quoted By:

The brain uses a lattice of neurons and chemicals to process and make us us
Computers are completely different in construction, and either need to simulate the brain with software (slow as fuck) or computers need to be engineered to be more like the brain (extremely expensive and the brain isn't terribly well understood)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 2021 18:19:32 No.12891156 Report

Quoted By:

>>12890189
that's copy pasta from some dude who posts on ycombinator. Reading out RNA one base at a time is retarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 27 Mar 2021 18:42:09 No.12891254 Report

Quoted By:

>>12890189
Neural networks are literally glorified statistics, and if you think brains work like that, you are retarded.
>Then how does it work?
Who knows? Even a nematode with 302 neurons is too hard for our "scientists".

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Mar 2021 01:15:25 No.12892478 Report

Quoted By:

>>12890189
how does RNA compute with itself?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Mar 2021 02:16:40 No.12892617 Report

Quoted By:

the error is that he tries to compare the brain to a computer.: hardware does a computation. the brain is more: the hardware is the computation

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Mar 2021 02:27:49 No.12892642 Report

Quoted By:

>>12890189
I've never once looked into neural nets or any other shit, never cared to, but I've started to figure that different parts of the brain compute different things and then said different things get utilized by other things to compute different things, and all these different things are essentially forked and individually maintained. basically clouds of individualized computations that overlap and interconnect. a very obvious exmaple being that comprehension of what you are seeing is a wholly separate section of the brain than actually making the image being comprehended.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches