>>12889944>MathematicsDepends on the existence of metaphysical objects that you can't possibly falsify, grounded in classical logic that doesn't hold up to scrutiny, research ontic vagueness.
Also, suppose that the existence of sets as distinct objects is erroneous. Suppose that there are only "1's" and that a "2" never actually comes into being. Suppose you don't have "10 fingers", you have a bunch of distinct "1's" that you call "10 fingers" because it's convenient for your brain to do so.
>EmpiricismSuppose you were to hallucinate doing an experiment.
Suppose you were to hallucinate people acknowledging that you did that experiment.
Suppose you were to hallucinate writing a report on that experiment.
Suppose you were to hallucinate being published.
Suppose you were to hallucinate people acknowledging that publication.
Suppose you were to hallucinate continued attempts to validate your findings from said experiment.
How would you determine whether the hallucinated experiment was hallucinated or not?