>>12877647IDIOT .. FUCK OFF... you can't just compare it to flat earth and then ask for a fucking citation, THAT'S IDIOTIC!! Do you have any fucking idea how easy it is to disprove the flat earth!? It is EXTREMELY easy to disprove such ideas online, the flat Earth is refuted by the measurement of “how far can I see from a tower”, the law being that the distance the square root of the product of the height of the tower and the radius of the Earth. This law extends from ship mast-towers of 20 meters, where you can see about 10km to airliners at 10 km, where you can see things up to 250 km away. The law is very easy to check today, and it can be done by anyone from a local mountain. IT'S THAT EASY. I DON'T NEED TO CITE A SCHOLARLY PAPER YOU FUCKING RETARD, GLOBE EARTH IS DOGMA. This means there aren't any fucking papers, not because it's wrong, because it's taboo. If I was appolonius and I figured out elliptical orbits, you think I could publish that shit!? NO! I could cite a billion scholarly geocentric papers, and not one heliocentric paper, not because what I knew wasn't obvious, but due to dogma and academic censorship! I don't know what this thread is about l, but if this thread is the flat earth of medfaggotry, then you should be able to refute it. If you can't do that, then that makes you the flat-earther of /sci/-posters, moron. If you can't do that, if you're too stupid, then you need to get the fuck off my board. GET OUT. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE BRAIN-POWER FOR /SCI/!!!
