A Musing in Two Parts

No.12873664 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Logical Level presupposes its a priori conceptualization. It is defined outside of itself. If everything is logical level there is no need for extra verbal fluff. Rest of Logical Level's Definition lies outside. It is assumed the definition adheres to definition.
Description of Logical Level is two words short of the Definition. Word conjunction "Logical Level" is not a part of the Description consisting with them Definition, so that to evade circularity.
Therefore, anticircularity considered, Description can't in any part duplicate "Logical Level" directly or synonymously. There are no thus means to re-check manually whether the description applies to "logical level" which is to be combined with said description into a definition.
In other words, there are no means to check whether description of "Logical Level" applies to word conjunction "Logical Level" thus making word conjunction Logical Level (Description) written in a singular Logical Level, thus forming a valid Definition, as opposed to verbal salad.
In other words, for "Logical Level Definition" to be a Definition, the Logical Level has to precede said Definition.
Same goes for "Logical Level is Undefinable", for it not to be considered word salad.
What "Logical Level" actually is is