>>12872185>>12871295Every (decent) philosopher will tell you that approaching 'the world' broadly speaking in a scientific way involves making assumptions about the way the world functions, the relationship of cause and effect and so on.
An basic exploration of as you mentioned psychology or quantum physics will show you that while science is useful for producing 'predictions' which can be measured in some way it doesn't actually 'explain' in any meaningful way what's really going on. At best it produces a symbolic rendition of the real. inputs go in, usually useful outcomes come out, but how the machine actually operates is itself devoid of meaning related to our basic experience.
