/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12870615

48KiB, 401x518, 6D2EF280-C96A-4BAF-A44E-4D0307685054.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 02:14:42 2021 No.12870615 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12870633 >>12870668 >>12871287 >>12873379

In your heart, you know this is wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 02:20:39 No.12870633 Report

Quoted By: >>12870648

>>12870615
That's just a coincidence and only possible because the nature of G(x)

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO plus-1.jpg, 21KiB, 400x400

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 02:24:46 No.12870648 Report

Quoted By: >>12875395

>>12870633
limits are bullshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 02:33:14 No.12870668 Report

Quoted By: >>12870790

>>12870615
I see nothing wrong here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 03:23:33 No.12870790 Report

Quoted By: >>12871379 >>12871410 >>12874551

>>12870668
$lim_h->0$ is fake nonsense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 03:27:09 No.12870799 Report

Quoted By: >>12870801

Haha bugers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 03:28:11 No.12870801 Report

Quoted By:

>>12870799
He's probably a leaf anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 03:30:03 No.12870807 Report

Quoted By:

Is this what is called a rational equation?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 06:33:55 No.12871287 Report

Quoted By: >>12871393

>>12870615
Isaac Newton is coming back from the dead to beat you ass, and maybe lose his virginity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 07:14:54 No.12871379 Report

Quoted By:

>>12870790
That's just basic differential calculus. How is it nonsense?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 07:19:40 No.12871393 Report

Quoted By:

>>12871287
Fluxions were infinitesimal, not limits

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 07:24:30 No.12871410 Report

Quoted By:

>>12870790
If you isolate h so that its irrelevant, its just like adding 0. If the algebraic structure doesnt need h, then fuck it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 18:41:47 No.12873379 Report

Quoted By: >>12873498

>>12870615
cancellign out h/h seems non trivial to me

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 19:12:35 No.12873498 Report

Quoted By:

>>12873379

Isn't real analysis supposed to solve these issues?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 23 Mar 2021 23:25:29 No.12874551 Report

Quoted By: >>12874727

>>12870790
you are right
$lim_h ->0$ is nonsense.

$\lim_{h\to 0}$ is truth

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 24 Mar 2021 00:17:39 No.12874727 Report

Quoted By: >>12875219

>>12874551
$\lim_{h \to 0}$ is fake nonsense too, perhaps you meant to say $\lim\limits_{h \to 0}$ .

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 24 Mar 2021 03:10:37 No.12875219 Report

Quoted By:

>>12874727
limits are pure cope from a field trying to stay relevant 200 years after its greatest triumph and when people started seeing scientists in general but especially physicists as the real seers instead of polymaths like Newton and Galileo.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 33D2D6F3-7808-4A66-A37C-76F45EDB (...).jpg, 797KiB, 2880x1800

Anonymous Wed 24 Mar 2021 04:40:00 No.12875395 Report

Quoted By:

>>12870648

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches