>>12868106Not the same anon, but you retards keep reiterating the same points, and I've already addressed them, e.g.
>>12857174 >>12863261>>12863663>>12863736>>12863900>>12864147I don't understand why it's so difficult to get a straight answer from SJWs like you. These are the issues:
(1) You claim that minorities and people of color should maintain their culture, their identity, their traditions, and you claim that they have a right to maintain control over their national homeland.
(2) However, you do not apply this standard to Europeans. If Europeans are proud of their heritage, and they want to maintain their culture, identity, and control over their national homeland, you say that this is racist, and that these people are literally Nazis.
(3) EVERY SINGLE one of your arguments for (1) and (2) comes down to a single point: that Europeans have such disgusting, violent, racist, and morally reprehensible history that we should apply different moral standards to Europeans people. In particular, because Europeans are so violent and racist, they no longer have a right to be proud of their culture and identity, and they no longer have a right to maintain their national identity.
I don't know how many times I have to say it. This is a bullshit argument. I recognize that slavery and colonialism were bad, but first of all, every race has engaged in slavery and colonialism, so Europeans are not unique in this respect, & secondly even if they have engaged in colonialism, that doesn't justify the idea that Europeans no longer have a right to maintain their culture and identity.
Ever single one of your arguments boils down to the claim that Europeans are so uniquely violent and oppressive, that we have to apply different moral standard to Europeans. Minorities and people of color should be proud of their heritage, and their culture, and their identity, and they have a right to maintain control over their homelands, because they aren't violent and racist.
