>>12854674Ok wise guy. The nucleus is still multiple orders of magnitudes smaller than the Bohr radius and integrating the prob. distribution over the extent of the nucleus still gives essentially zero.
>>12854748> No, that's the integrated charge distribution.It's not. is the probability density function of finding the electron in the interval . If you don't know the difference then congratulations, you're an idiot.
Your genius website makes the same mistake.
> ChemistryOh, that's why.
Fig. 3-5 is accurate, the rest is flawed.
>Your charge distribution function depends on your integral spaceNo it does not. You can't just drop the and pretend that's a meaningful probability distribution. End of story.
