/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12841864

113KiB, 1280x1279, hannu.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 17:58:14 2021 No.12841864 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12842530 >>12842731

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28gravity+constant%29*%28speed+of+light%29%5E2

someone please explain why gravity constant times speed of light squared is 6e6 SI units?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:00:06 No.12841869 Report

Quoted By: >>12841963

>multiply two distantly related constants
>get an arbitrary number
I'm not sure what you expected?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:16:32 No.12841963 Report

Quoted By: >>12841967

>>12841869
>'m not sure what you expected?
Connection between these two fundaments inverse square forces

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:17:51 No.12841967 Report

Quoted By: >>12841984

>>12841963
the speed of light isn't an inverse square force. by the way, if you do this computation in other units you get totally different numbers. it's meaningless.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:20:41 No.12841984 Report

Quoted By: >>12841989

>>12841967
>what is magnetism

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:21:43 No.12841989 Report

Quoted By: >>12841994

>>12841984
>what is the coulomb constant
please read a book

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:23:09 No.12841994 Report

Quoted By:

>>12841989
eps*mu=1/c^2

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:26:47 No.12842010 Report

Quoted By: >>12842014 >>12842564

i have no idea what the point of this thread is

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:27:58 No.12842014 Report

Quoted By: >>12842041 >>12842179 >>12842314

>>12842010
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%285%2F6%29%28vacuum+permeability%29*%28gravity+constant%29*%28speed+of+light%29%5E2%2F%282*pi%29

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:33:50 No.12842041 Report

Quoted By:

>>12842014
>change the units
>get different number

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 18:58:48 No.12842179 Report

Quoted By: >>12842205

>>12842014
But the pi comes from the way the units were originally formulated
You know, until we decided that charge is more fundamental than current

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:03:39 No.12842205 Report

Quoted By: >>12842219

>>12842179
current is more fundamental than charge in SI

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:05:33 No.12842219 Report

Quoted By: >>12842256

>>12842205
Not anymore
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_redefinition_of_the_SI_base_units

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:11:14 No.12842256 Report

Quoted By: >>12842272

>>12842219
idid you read the article? It says that as of 2019, the Ampere is a base unit and Coulomb is derived. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_base_unit

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot from 2021-03-16 14-14 (...).png, 80KiB, 1099x315

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:14:52 No.12842272 Report

Quoted By: >>12842292

>>12842256
>reading comprehension

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:19:56 No.12842292 Report

Quoted By: >>12842295

>>12842272
holy fuck you are dumb. nowhere does that say C is a base unit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampere
>The ampere (/?æmp??r/, US: /?æmpJ?r/;[1][2][3] symbol: A),[4] often shortened to "amp",[5] is the base unit of electric current in the International System of Units (SI).[6][7]

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:20:59 No.12842295 Report

Quoted By: >>12842302

>>12842292
What SI considers "base" isn't the same thing as fundamental. Which is the word that I originally used.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:22:31 No.12842302 Report

Quoted By: >>12842329

>>12842295
you must be autistic because ive been talking specifically about SI this entire time

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:25:46 No.12842314 Report

Quoted By:

>>12842014" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_coincidence>>12842014
>https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%285%2F6%29%28vacuum+permeability%29*%28gravity+constant%29*%28speed+of+light%29%5E2%2F%282*pi%29
>(5/6)
why yes, faggot. if you take any arbitrary combination of fundamental constants, and multiply it by a coefficient bounded between 0 and 1, you're guaranteed to get a number close to an integer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:28:30 No.12842329 Report

Quoted By: >>12842334

>>12842302
Well then certainly you must be able to justify why current is a base unit and not charge
(Hint: it's because when SI was made up, it was easier to measure)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 19:29:32 No.12842334 Report

Quoted By:

>>12842329
"yes"

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 20:03:36 No.12842530 Report

Quoted By: >>12842690

>>12841864
explain to me how his out of this world amounts of of luck are even possible

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 20:10:56 No.12842564 Report

Quoted By:

>>12842010
It's called "le shitto posto" a type of italian thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 20:32:54 No.12842690 Report

Quoted By:

>>12842530
what luck?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 20:40:12 No.12842731 Report

Quoted By: >>12842756

>>12841864
square the gravity constant and you get 4, aka the 4 dimensions of our universe. Leave out gravity only square speed of light, and you get 6, aka the number of visible points on a cube, lets also not forget a cubes shadow is also a hexagon.

Whatever you do OP, don't stop digging, you're onto something big here

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Mar 2021 20:43:28 No.12842756 Report

Quoted By:

>>12842731
Is this the power of sacred geometry?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches