>>12838950The pouch literally makes no sense.
we're not fucking marsupials.
And the more primitive legs with the foot elongated and walking on the pads.
It's not like us at all.
those kinds of legs are meant for animals that run very fast like cheetah and dogs.
being up right doesn't make sense for this at all.
The only thing like this is Jerboa and Kangaroos.
Jumping/bounding animals.
the arms would need to be tucked in while moving like these animals.
and we'd need a tail as a counter balance like these animals.
But the legs are still not right, those jumping animals also have very long flat feet.
It's obviously designed by some kind of art major retard.
The more optimal female would be much bigger.
at least 6'5+
larger women give birth much easier.
The reason the breasts aren't present tells me it's mimicking a marsupial and the nipple is in the pouch.
the pouch really really doesn't make sense so breasts are kept.
Due to their massive size they'll need larger fat deposits around the natural feminine region, the thighs, the posterior, around the shoulders, etc.
Possibly larger eyes, the elf ears seems to be pointless so better ones can be established.
The male will be extremely dimorphic in comparison.
The male would be smaller relative to the female and attaches similar as an angler. It attaches onto the back and it's body atrophies and connects its arms as aid for holding onto children for the females.
Due to the weight the female needs larger breasts as counter balances.
The male is mostly a brain very large and the skin hardens like a shell, leaving eyes on the back and the legs forming into a second pair of arms.
I'm no artists but pic related would pic the profile.
Though I'm seeing the picture and the breasts may need to be bigger to be a proper counter weight, or the legs bigger.
>inb4 the male is blackno its skin is hardened like sclerotized chitin.
it looks much more insect like than fleshy.
The pigment is really blue and yelw
