>>12836305Ah yes just in line with your postmodernist bible. Language is oppressive and empiricism is the generator of oppression.
So to overthrow the shackles of western white male patriarcho-imperialism, we first take control of the language, and then discredit empiricism by claiming that no objective claim can be valid. Voila - infinite genders that are defined by subjective interpretation and not objective truth.
But I wonder, does this stop at just genders or does it extend to all other "oppressive normative cultural structures". Such as race for an example. Perhaps that was the end goal all along?
You know, that whole enlightenment thing and the overthrow of the church... I actually don't agree with it because I, a postmodernist, believe in the subjective rationalism and just cannot agree with enlightenment values and specifically the scientific method and empiricism. But I don't like the church either so I can't be a counter-enlightenment reactionary. What am I then? Oh right, the radical rationalist who is trying to undo the enlightenment but not by bringing back the pope, rather by making my own antinaturalist religion where the negro and semite are the new clergy who get to decide the morality of the masses, and where the privileged masses cannot override the religion through empiricism. The same clergy that burned the scientists for their empiricism, but half-negrified and half-judified instead.
But to do that, I must first destroy the scientific method which is championed by math. Math, the enforcer of objectivity, is therefor my enemy. Lucky me my postmodernist bible already tells me what I must do to specifically achieve this, which involves the critique of language and normative agreements. Such as the neo-colonialist agreement that 2+2=5, which, if extended just a few steps further, creates the empirical crime stats and IQ chart which is highly problematic.
