>>12833058But if you run a difference image of the two exposure which show the object you see this. In the right portion of the image there is zero difference between these two exposures. That cannot be real, the noise and the cosmic rays should differ. So the portion of the image which show the object is just a duplicate of the first one. It's not real. And the claims about missing data are also false. There is only a gap of an hour, which is not unusual for SOHO given it's 25 years of operation.
So the object only appears in a single image. It is totally absent from a second image taken just 6 minutes later. it probably isn't real.
