>>12835647from looking at various articles that i could find for free
theres is a baseline for ratios of xe129, but there are also some serious outliers in our solar system, mostly asteroids and comets
there's also some 27,000 chondrite objects in our solar system and less than 100 of them have been observed up close
there's also significant differences in the amount of Xe129 released by chondrite meteorites at different temperatures as observed in data obtained by testing the Allende meteorite
Mars is also much closer to the asteroid belt where there are a lot of chondrites
Compared to aliens nuking each other,
Its at least as possible that massive asteroids / dwarf planet / moon collided with mars in a fashion that would produce huge amounts of Xe129
this guy who proposes natural nuclear reaction
>http://davidaroffman.com/photo4_6.htmlsays it happened 180 million years ago
mars dried up 3-4billion years ago so he supposes that there are craters that got filled in with sand
but other craters on mars haven't filled up
and theres still the glass
glass would have been covered up much the same as a crater but we see evidence of the glass on the surface with no craters
air blast nukes dont make glass at all, and there's no evidence of glass at Tunguska
and why would aliens be there at all, nevermind nuking each other, 2.5-3.5 billion years after the planet died and dried up? The only thing I can come up with is that they wanted to hide their own existence, but it would be at least 120 million years before early primates first show up in the fossil record, so that makes no sense
every suggestion requires some sort of mental gymnastics
to me the glass with no crater points to a meteor and humanity just not knowing enough about natural events that occur in our solar system
