/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12829514

126KiB, 602x498, electromagnetism.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Classical Unified Theory

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 02:37:28 2021 No.12829514 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12829564 >>12829645 >>12829733 >>12829821

Hello /sci/entards, your favorite physicist is back with a new paper!

I performed the dimensional analysis previously requested.

Paper is here: https://vixra.org/abs/2103.0080

You can see for yourselves that the dimensions work and aren't just a bunch of schizo hallucinations. Enjoy!

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Pseud.png, 161KiB, 803x409

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 02:44:23 No.12829531 Report

Quoted By: >>12829546

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Pseud.png, 174KiB, 888x412

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 02:46:08 No.12829534 Report

Quoted By: >>12829546

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Pseud.png, 162KiB, 937x519

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 02:47:49 No.12829538 Report

Quoted By: >>12829546

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 02:49:54 No.12829546 Report

Quoted By: >>12829549

>>12829531
>>12829534
>>12829538

Not sure what point you're trying to make buddy. This is what people asked for.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 02:51:42 No.12829549 Report

Quoted By: >>12829558

>>12829546
it was me who asked for that, because i wanted to see what asspull you attempted, and how many constants you'd need to invent to justify your schizo shit. evidently you define SIX constants, all equal to 1, to explain your schizo shit. you have more dimensional correcting "1"s than you do anything else in your actual equations. if you don't see that point, then you just confirm what people have been telling you: you're a schizo pseud.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 02:56:18 No.12829558 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829549

Well when you're calculating ground state versions of stuff, you end up setting a bunch of variables equal to 1. Who'da thunk?

You can see exactly where they all come from and follow the logic behind them. I thought it was dumb to include a bunch of extra clutter too, so that's why it wasn't there in the original.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:00:39 No.12829564 Report

Quoted By: >>12829582

>>12829514
Are you not tired of us just constantly bashing your complete inadequacy? At least Tooker had some "gotcha" moments with his shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:04:39 No.12829582 Report

Quoted By: >>12829587 >>12829589

>>12829564

Eh, not yet. It is kinda tiresome to wave 1+1=2 in people's faces and still not have them see it, but oh well. Can't expect much more from this place I guess.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:06:11 No.12829587 Report

Quoted By: >>12829591

>>12829582
type it up in latex and submit it to arxiv then.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:07:49 No.12829589 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829582
Yeah, you're right. The stuff you present is really obvious...in your schizo head. Serious question: have you attended a psychiatrist recently? All this shit is fun and all, but mental disorders can be very debilitating. Have you talked to any family members or friends recently?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:08:40 No.12829591 Report

Quoted By: >>12829604

>>12829587

It's in latex. Can't post to arxiv without sponsors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:12:15 No.12829604 Report

Quoted By: >>12829612

>>12829591
Not your original paper. Merge the two. Contact one of your old professors. You went to THE OSU, after all. I'm sure with your brilliant intellect that you stood out in at least one of your classes as an all-star genius, potentially winning numerous awards, right? I'm positive one of them would go to bat for you. Surely you left such a positive impression on them that they'd do that, right?

I second the other Anon: when's the last time you've contacted your close friends or family? Have you seen a clinician lately? Not even shitposting here mate, you're demonstrating some early signs of disorders. You appear to maybe still have a job. You need to catch this stuff early if you want to keep it, or else you'll do some schizo shit and get fired, and become homeless eventually. You may think you're above it, but you're not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:18:36 No.12829612 Report

Quoted By: >>12829623

>>12829604

Nope, that was over 10 years ago. I've emailed a bunch of people, but no response so far. I also messaged some of my friends and relatives who have PhD's for feedback but haven't gotten any yet. Some of them told me they just don't understand it (they have STEM degrees but not physics).

Asking for sponsorship might be a good idea though. Would it change anything if I could get the paper up on arxiv?

I'm not gonna answer any more schizo questions, it's overdone.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:24:07 No.12829623 Report

Quoted By: >>12829636 >>12829662 >>12829678

>>12829612
>he doesn't understand the difference between viXra and arXiv
kek. i'm torn, on the one hand I don't want you wasting physicists precious time (i choose to waste mine here, so that's my folly). one the other hand i think it'd be funny to see you get rejected or possibly reamed by someone who's bored and actually reads your email/paper.

arXiv is for experts, viXra is for cranks. you do the math on whether it matters to be published on arXiv and not viXra.

>[ViXra] has a reputation among physicists for hosting "material of no interest". Physicist Gerard 't Hooft writes, "When a paper is published in viXra, it is usually a sign that it is not likely to contain acceptable results. It may, but the odds against that are considerable".

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:29:29 No.12829636 Report

Quoted By: >>12829640 >>12829641

>>12829623

Hmm all right. I'll see what I can do about getting sponsorship then. The thing about arXiv is that it apparently has to be sponsored by physicists who have actually posted papers recently and regularly. My 70-year-old classical mechanics prof from OSU might not cut it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:30:48 No.12829640 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829636
that's be design to keep cranks like you off of it. i'm saying this clearly and unambiguously: nobody will sponsor you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:31:49 No.12829641 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829636

Also, a lot of my classmates who went to OSU for physics and got their PhD's left academia already. I can think of maybe a couple people who might sponsor me though.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO kek-o.jpg, 33KiB, 453x500

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:33:24 No.12829645 Report

Quoted By: >>12829654

>>12829514
>"aether"
>"the dimensions work, guys I swear!"
>c dot = 1/4c on the next line
>naming a frame after some bloke who killed himself from being a schizo in denial
>equating constants to 1 everywhere
>G = 1/16pi*c
>units stated everywhere for no fucking reason
>"which we have already verified by dimensional analysis"
>no experimental predictions
>"Thank you Aubrey Plaza for being quirky and attractive."

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:36:59 No.12829654 Report

Quoted By: >>12829661 >>12829665

>>12829645

This is a paper on dimensional analysis. If you want experimental predictions you can find a bunch in the 30-page original.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:38:56 No.12829661 Report

Quoted By: >>12829666

>>12829654
Mate, tell me how come when you take a time derivative with respect to velocity you end up with something that has units of s/m? Is this what you call dimensional analysis?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:38:58 No.12829662 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829623

Maybe I'll start small and just see if I can get the MM analysis up on arXiv. That's short, straightforward, and clear-cut mathematically. Then I can see about getting the rest of the theory past whatever gatekeepers are there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:40:37 No.12829665 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829654
>aether drag force
>dimensions of acceleration
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:41:21 No.12829666 Report

Quoted By: >>12829673

>>12829661

Please refer to an equation number if you want a response.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:44:10 No.12829673 Report

Quoted By: >>12829688

>>12829666
As you wish. Eq 1. You're taking a time derivative wrt/ to the speed of light, so I expect your answer to have units of m/s^2. You end up with a reciprocal of the speed of light times a numerical constant, which means it has units of s/m. How come?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:45:35 No.12829678 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829623
>one the other hand i think it'd be funny to see you get rejected or possibly reamed by someone who's bored and actually reads your email/paper.

Most of the theoretical stuff on arXiv is pure shit anyway so mine will probably fit right in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:48:26 No.12829688 Report

Quoted By: >>12829694

>>12829673

Excellent question friend. Equation 1 is how I presented the equation in my original paper. Equation 2 is the version that I use for the dimensional analysis.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO brain_chess.jpg, 94KiB, 710x512

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:51:48 No.12829694 Report

Quoted By: >>12829708

>>12829688
Ah, I see. So you made up so bullshit "unitary" coefficients, equated them to 1, so now your units are all fine and dandy. I gotta give it to you, that's utterly retarded and brilliantly genius at the same time. Bravo!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 03:57:30 No.12829708 Report

Quoted By: >>12829721

>>12829694

I mean, the analysis is exactly the same as the original paper (barring a negative sign), except that in the original when I set the variables to 1 I just didn't bother continuing to write them out in equations. Anyway thank. Nobel prize when?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 4dchesss.jpg, 61KiB, 591x555

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:01:27 No.12829721 Report

Quoted By: >>12829730

>>12829708
I'll give you a prize for the most absurd yet original solution to your own fuckup. The units don't work? Don't worry guys, let me multiply everything by 1 and pretend like they do. Fucking 4D chess moves right here, my man. I don't think a middle-schooler would even think of that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:04:38 No.12829730 Report

Quoted By: >>12829738 >>12829748

>>12829721

Yeah regular physics is way better. Only 20-some "fundamental" constants to make all of the equations work numerically with the correct units. Kek.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:05:17 No.12829733 Report

Quoted By: >>12829747

>>12829514
Don’t listen to these haters anon. I believe in you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:06:36 No.12829738 Report

Quoted By: >>12829757

>>12829730
yeah, what a bunch of morons, right? Who needs all these constants, when you can invent your own out of thin air and equate them to 1, amirite?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:08:05 No.12829747 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829733

Thanks buddy. I appreciate it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:08:26 No.12829748 Report

Quoted By: >>12829770

>>12829730
that's not the function of the fundamental constants, bro. plus, there are far fewer than 20.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:10:51 No.12829757 Report

Quoted By: >>12829767

>>12829738

In the aether drag force equation, they probably won't really be equal to 1 since there's also a 1/4 in there that's unaccounted for (probably to do with surface area). It's been discussed previously.

Nearly all of the rest of the constants are actually variables that I was setting to 1 because I was calculating ground state properties of particles.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:13:43 No.12829767 Report

Quoted By: >>12829776 >>12829781 >>12829791

>>12829757
Tell me, oh great inventor of fundamental constants, what do any of these constants mean physically? You know, G is the strength of gravitational attraction, c is the speed of light, etc. What physical interpretation does "unitary acceleration" have?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:14:48 No.12829770 Report

Quoted By: >>12829782

>>12829748
> that's not the function of the fundamental constants, bro. plus, there are far fewer than 20.
> F = 6.67*10^-11 * m_1 * m_2 / r^2 doesn't work, how do we fix this? Fuck it, just make a constant G with units m^3/(kg * s^2). Where do the units come from? Who fucking knows!

You're right, much better. If you read my earlier work, you can see I'm working on reducing the number of arbitrary parameters in physics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:17:48 No.12829776 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829767
he has
1. unitary acceleration
2. unitary velocity
3. unitary areal mass density
4. unitary wave number
5. unitary time
6. unitary force per volume
poor, poor pseud. if he actually understood dimensional analysis, he'd realize he could have done all of this simply inventing three unitary units. that's how we know he's just making shit up as he goes, and isn't actually thinking about dimensions in his work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:19:52 No.12829781 Report

Quoted By: >>12829804

>>12829767

What does G mean physically?

g = F/m = M * dc/dt / (4 * pi * r^2 * surface density constant) is an improvement over nothing at all, which is the current interpretation. At least in my version it comes from Newton's 2nd law.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:20:42 No.12829782 Report

Quoted By: >>12829795

>>12829770
that's not how it works, pseud. the gravitational law exposes that the force between two massive objects is
1. proportional to the first body's mass
2. proportional to the second body's mass
3. inversely proportional to the distance between them squared
that's it. then the constant comes in as a free variable which is experimentally determined.

in the case of maxwell's equations, the speed of light pops up naturally as a function of the permittivity and permeability of free space.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:24:11 No.12829791 Report

Quoted By: >>12829804 >>12829810

>>12829767
>What physical interpretation does "unitary acceleration" have?

It's just a convenient placeholder for a unit of acceleration. You could write the aether drag equation as dc/dt = C_d/c where C_d is a drag coefficient if you wanted to get rid of it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:26:39 No.12829795 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829782
>that's it. then the constant comes in as a free variable which is experimentally determined.
>in the case of maxwell's equations, the speed of light pops up naturally as a function of the permittivity and permeability of free space.

Yeah... you actually don't know wtf you're talking about, which isn't too surprising. Where do the units of G come from again? Oh right, they're "experimentally determined". Kek.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:28:17 No.12829804 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829781
I just fucking told you what it means. If it were greater than 6.67*10^{-11} N*m^2/kg^2, then the same amount of matter would gravitate with a larger force. You would see this with stuff like orbital radii or orbital velocities. If you do a Cavendish experiment, you can compare the force of gravity with the force due to torsion and measure G from it. How do I physically measure your unitary bullshit?
>>12829791
>It's just a convenient placeholder for a unit of acceleration.
Where did that acceleration even pop out of and what is a "unit of acceleration". Do you know what a unit is dude? How did you pass general physics 1? I fucking swear you read about natural units, misinterpreted it, because you never professionally worked with them in grad school, and then thought "I can just equate everything to 1, because theoretical physicists do that".

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:30:05 No.12829810 Report

Quoted By: >>12829820

>>12829791
btw here's a video that explain what "natural units" means and it literally addresses your idiotic notion of making everything equal to 1 just because
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP5G20ImveU

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:35:09 No.12829820 Report

Quoted By: >>12829827

>>12829810
Imagine this schizos shit with natural units. *shudder*

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:35:33 No.12829821 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829514
IM HERE FOR YOUR MANCHERRY NIGGA GIVE IT UP

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Mar 2021 04:37:58 No.12829827 Report

Quoted By:

>>12829820
Yeah. Better make up 6 constants in a single paper that one can't even measure experimentally. That sounds sane.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches