>>12817596Signals and processing:
Definitive:
If we force somebody, he can make it, but doesn't have to. Even thou he's forced, it may be out of his existential capacities to be processed with your poor signal prediction skills, and your reason for suggesting signal is memory less, is trying to suggest somebody who surprised you, to be memory less, so he won't remember, he had a reason. Without reasons, thoughts won't happen and without toughs there cannot be whim signal, therefore without whim signal, you're memory less, after you whim-ed, because somebody things, or somethings thinks that memorylesnes is to make something unexpected, but in fact, when you don't expect something, it just means, you are misspredicting some state.
It's like:
-Quiet.
-A word.
-You must be memory less, you did something I haven't expected.
It's been told by old teacher, who haven't liked students talking, because they got also ESP, and he was mathematician, missing half the facts.
Somebody once said signal is finite, but in the end, there's a problem, he disabled unremembered things to pass captcha, just because then they cannot speak, so they have to refresh the memory.
It will achieve clearly to process signals, clear and nice, without errors, but not with wrong signal processing. Maybe giving signal to be memory less, was a mistake. Signal was a memory. Even thou, it's infinitives haven't been disproved, just some slight pause for remembrance in it's continuality have been noted.
What happens once we stop processing a signal? Death? Darkness? Something unpleasant, because if we stop processing signals, we are memoryless, therefore we don't happen. Good things wants to happen. Anyway, if you still see something, process is not over. But then it's not signal processing but control systems. If you process signal, you are loosing control systems, you don't want to because without control systems you cannot stop recieving a signal, or influence it.
