/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12814471

658KiB, 735x577, Enkidu.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 10 Mar 07:28:09 2021 No.12814471 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12814668 >>12814670

How do we deal with the fact that the validity of any quantum probability that we record, is dependent on the stability of the machine which records it, given that the machine itself is only in any given state with some probability?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO GIRUGAMESH.png, 122KiB, 452x391

Anonymous Wed 10 Mar 2021 07:51:33 No.12814509 Report

Quoted By: >>12814541

measurement error

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Mar 2021 08:03:35 No.12814541 Report

Quoted By: >>12814641

>>12814509
But if we take measurement error of measurement error ad infinitum doesnt the probability of all things and their opposite approach 0?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Mar 2021 08:54:37 No.12814641 Report

Quoted By:

>>12814541
At the deepest level, this is why we have multiple different results in quantum experiments

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 Mar 2021 09:12:20 No.12814668 Report

Quoted By:

>>12814471
You take the QBism pill and accept the fact that quantum states in reality are not absolute, "tangible" objects. They are simply representations of our knowledge about the quantum system.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO maxresdefault (73).jpg, 166KiB, 1280x720

Anonymous Wed 10 Mar 2021 09:16:35 No.12814670 Report

Quoted By:

>>12814471

Decoherence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSnq5Hs3_wI

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches