>>12809274>That's not what agnostic means.Your abstract form of Deism is thinly-veiled agnosticism. You don't believe in a personal God, but you refuse to take a stance. Either you misunderstand what atheism is, or you mantain this stance because it's easier for you to tip toe around the edges when asked about your religion.
>*god. It's irrelevant to which.Reducing "God" to an abstract concept to the point it is a meaningless word is basically atheism, you are just fence-sitting. Atheism is not the denial God exists, it's the refusal to believe in anything beyond that for which there's material evidence. The Christian God may exist, it's just the probability is extremely low, no different than the probability of Buddhism being real. None should merit our special attention.
>Physics and mathematics is true science while other fields are just phenomenon. Christianity focused exclusively on phenomena, the "good" and "evil" of man.Philosophy is concerned with the ethics of man, it needn't be religious. You are giving some special authority to Christianity (over other religions as well as over secular thinkers) that isn't warranted.