>>12809586go back to /pol/
>>12807070if it is, it's gonna be through rna. rna is way smaller, has fewer peices, literall way easier to build things out of (versus peptides). the guy at northwestern is doing that shit rn
i feel like curing cancer is ultimately about doing enough individual tests on you that they can make a targeted cocktail of whatever, it's just when you multiply that by the actual number people that get cancer, it's never gonna happen.
also your ribosomes are made completely out of rna. rna was probably around way before dna or anything else
>Will gene therapy finally cure cancer?not if you're poor
