>>12805818>Elon wasn't talking to an automotive engineer about production methodology and materials science in the interviewsuperficially, he lacks knowledge of substance which becomes obvious when hes in a conversation with actual experts
elon knows enough to give off the impression to clueless retard, waving a nice shiny object to distract
>you're too much of a fucking retard to bother with you due dilligencewhy make this personal hmmm?
we are talking about how elon is a fraud, now why do you go from that to insulting anonymous strangers.
average musk bootlicker just cant help themselves i guess
>Maybe give some kind of argumentread the thread, countless arguments were given, but you conveniently choose to ignore all of them
there were even sources linked debunking elon, which you als completely ignore
>Considering SpaceX is one of the most cost effective launch providers on the planet at the momentthey are not, not even when heavily subsidized
the launch prizes stated are dumping prizes manufactured to boot out competition, nothing more or less
>their cars are some of the safest production vehicles in existenceand you are unable to quantify that claim in a meaningful way
>they're the only automotive company in existence at the moment with anything close to self drivingthis is plain wrong, also the whole concept of self driving is flawed as its not whole, driving assistance is what is actually meant with self driving
self driving is a marketing buzzword
>I'm gonna say you're full of shit and also a retardno arguments of substance, better rely on ad-hominem to get the upper hand, as you are unable to do that with rhetoric prowess
>Blue Origin would be far beyond anything SpaceX is doing, given the resources they have availablenot the hype and not the prestige, not the media attention etc.
> maybe this senior Falcon 9 developer is full of shithes talking about the person that pays his salary, so this endorsement is meaningless
