/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12797462

27KiB, 598x309, Screenshot_2021-03-06 Elon Musk on Twitter.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

SN 10 Landing

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 15:51:44 2021 No.12797462 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12797595 >>12797764 >>12800345 >>12803051

Issue has been identified and it will be fixed next flight

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1368016384458858500

Also Landing legs.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1614959402569.png, 70KiB, 446x435

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 16:06:03 No.12797517 Report

Quoted By: >>12797584 >>12803721

Elon cope
Starship will never happen

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 16:26:43 No.12797584 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797517
It's already happening. You're late.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 16:29:17 No.12797595 Report

Quoted By: >>12797630

>>12797462
Pathetic. It'll never work if they keep making those half assed prototypes that are supposed to fail.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 16:43:43 No.12797630 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797595
>noooo you can't use destructive testing to save money and avoid weird crashes in the long run
>you have to use the classical method nooo

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO SN10 Red & Blue Tail Lights.jpg, 20KiB, 520x430

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 16:55:09 No.12797664 Report

Quoted By: >>12802449

Take a look at the SpaceX video during the period that two engines were firing. The output of one is red, the other blue, not momentarily but continuously during the two engine period of the ascent. I'd bet on an engine having been damaged slightly, leaking slowly (thus the fire on landing), and then eventually failing enough that a significant amount of methane and oxygen escaped.
That`s why there was at least one leak of methane and why one engine didn`t work as intended.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2021-03-06 Leo ?? on (...).png, 33KiB, 577x434

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 16:58:22 No.12797675 Report

Quoted By:

https://twitter.com/TerminalCount/status/1367261799293272068

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 17:09:02 No.12797696 Report

Quoted By:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNLdDvt6wS0&t=30s

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 4FD1F62300000578-6142193-image-m (...).jpg, 53KiB, 634x432

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 17:33:27 No.12797764 Report

Quoted By: >>12798123

>>12797462

i was wondering why they dont just leave all three engines on and throttle down ?Turning rocket engines on and off while hurtling towards the ground seems kinda risky.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2021-03-06 SpaceX Sta (...).png, 35KiB, 550x384

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 18:23:52 No.12797958 Report

Quoted By: >>12798021 >>12798086 >>12798139 >>12798239 >>12801655

There we go again

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 18:41:29 No.12798021 Report

Quoted By: >>12798088 >>12798214 >>12798244

>>12797958

you know one of those spacex rockets is going to come down on somebodies house someday and they will ban re-usable rockets.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 18:57:56 No.12798086 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797958
>These tend to go somewhat quickly, so I'd be surprised if there was an impact to the SN11 schedule.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 18:58:23 No.12798088 Report

Quoted By:

>>12798021
>ban re-usable rockets
>well now, you can see by the state of it that it will not be re-usable, thus your ban does not relate to me

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 19:07:16 No.12798123 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797764
From tests, Space X always said just one engine is needed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 19:11:05 No.12798139 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797958
Just let musk blow up however many rockets he wants you fucking commies

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 19:33:38 No.12798214 Report

Quoted By:

>>12798021
Reusable has the same self destruct charges installed as any other legacy rocket. There is no difference in debris risk.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 19:39:31 No.12798239 Report

Quoted By: >>12802464

>>12797958
Mishap? What Mishap? They weren't testing for a successful landing, it was a "since we're doing that we might as well also do this" attempt.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 19:40:34 No.12798244 Report

Quoted By: >>12798786

>>12798021
Nigga Boing planes are literally falling apart midair and we're still flying them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 Mar 2021 21:31:02 No.12798786 Report

Quoted By:

>>12798244
That's more of a race issue than anything. Space X isn't going to staff their flight maintenance and pilots with pajeets and Malaysians

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO crack team.jpg, 17KiB, 314x495

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 02:58:46 No.12800345 Report

Quoted By: >>12800478 >>12801582 >>12802473

>>12797462
>Issue has been identified
identified?
Thrust was low despite being commanded high for reasons unknown at present, hence hard touchdown. We’ve never seen this before.
*the issue is identified as being for an unknown reason at present.

>and it will be fixed next flight
Next time, min two engines all the way to the ground & restart engine 3 if engine 1 or 2 have issues.
*so its solve the problem by not fixing the "fault" which is they are not outputting the power they are expected to be outputting but instead ignore it.... leave the "fault" as is and hope 3 "faulty" engines can come up with enough "less than expected" power to at least manage to output the same as one "not-faulty" engine was expected to output!!!

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1521170357205.gif, 167KiB, 500x382

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 03:35:50 No.12800478 Report

Quoted By: >>12800541

>>12800345
>Thrust was low despite being commanded high for reasons unknown at present, hence hard touchdown. We’ve never seen this before.
>*the issue is identified as being for an unknown reason at present.

Yes, that is identify the issue, to know what happens with a certain piece of equipment. Is the first step to correct it, to know that there`s a problem, understand why happens and take remedial solutions.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO go team!!!.jpg, 53KiB, 499x376

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 03:58:48 No.12800541 Report

Quoted By:

>>12800478
>Is the first step to correct it, to know that there`s a problem, understand why happens
reason unknown..
they now what and where but not why.
>and take remedial solutions.
no attempt to fix the engines so they will then work as expected... they'll continue to use faulty engines like a half-ass ignoring the problem and just step on the gas harder.. thats the solution...
poor standards.
shit company.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 10:58:11 No.12801582 Report

Quoted By: >>12801626 >>12801852 >>12803087 >>12803735 >>12804741

>>12800345
Yes, spacex approach is retarded. They are copying the software method of "just patch it bro" instead of doing thorough investigations, which would probably show design flaws.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 11:21:48 No.12801626 Report

Quoted By:

>>12801582
That's completely wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 11:36:42 No.12801655 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797958
Whenever a rocket explode they do this investigation, it's standard procedure, don't know why people are bothering with this

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO SN10.jpg, 31KiB, 372x550

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 13:14:00 No.12801852 Report

Quoted By:

>>12801582
this

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 17:11:10 No.12802449 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797664
one engine was on full power, the other one not, they cant use them all at full thrust as the rocket gets lighter from spent fuel, they have to hit their flight ceiling without overshooting, or the FAA gets pissed again

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 17:16:16 No.12802464 Report

Quoted By: >>12803103

>>12798239
i dont get their wording either. having a successful landing is just the cherry on top, it is not expected, they are still testing belly flop and flip back and engine re ignition after all that. and still they handle these explosions like major aerospace accidents, like its not supposed to happen, everything perfect on the first try. these goddamn FAA pencil pushers

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 17:18:08 No.12802473 Report

Quoted By: >>12803076

>>12800345
>leave the "fault"
because they want to catch the fault in action to see what is causing it. thats the whole reason for destructive testing. shit like that wont show up in simulations

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 19:27:43 No.12803051 Report

Quoted By: >>12803284

>>12797462
>Issue has been identified

But they don't know why.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 19:35:09 No.12803076 Report

Quoted By: >>12803136

>>12802473
I doubt.
they'll eventually end up with starship having all its engines fitted and using brute force to compensate.
The engines will always be dodgy & you'll never hear about this again until a bunch of families die on mars.

Starship has hit an impasse & you're going to witness the dodgy band aid solution never get fixed & come up with excuse after excuse explaining why starship is great and no such engine flaw exists.

Muskcucks on these type of threads are all about bullshit coverup and sucking on Musk cock.... nothing more.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 19:36:49 No.12803087 Report

Quoted By:

>>12801582
Maybe they are doing whatever necessary to land so that they can examine intact post-flight engines. If there was enough data to identify the real issue they probably would have figured it out before speaking publicly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 19:39:53 No.12803103 Report

Quoted By:

>>12802464
Considering that the last two 'investigations' were progressively shorter and not very long to begin with, it's probably just common agency language that starship fans are overreacting to.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 19:47:34 No.12803136 Report

Quoted By: >>12803182

>>12803076
Imagine watching a stream with huge metallic rocket ship with sexy blue flame go up and then flip around and do propulsive landing and you decide to get mad about it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 19:59:28 No.12803182 Report

Quoted By: >>12804599

>>12803136
You'll see spluttering engines bust their guts to succeed by the skin of their teeth & accept it as the new norm & continue sucking muskcock well after everyone also accepts a bunch of families getting killed sometimes as being acceptable risk of space tourism.
people like you are incapable of change.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 36A8907B-A7D6-4282-AF07-824859A1 (...).jpg, 65KiB, 636x848

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 20:07:52 No.12803212 Report

Quoted By:

Musk is my hero.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 20:23:42 No.12803284 Report

Quoted By:

>>12803051
You can identify a tranny, but you don't know what had caused their mental illness.
Problem has been identified and it will be examined and corrected in timely fashion.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 22:02:14 No.12803721 Report

Quoted By:

>>12797517
You mind if I screenshot for a couple years from now when Starship does a successful landing from orbit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 07 Mar 2021 22:05:37 No.12803735 Report

Quoted By:

>>12801582
They ARE doing thorough investigations. That's the point of blowing up so many prototypes like this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:07:57 No.12804599 Report

Quoted By: >>12804628

>>12803182
Even if all of this happens, compared to what? NASA?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:14:35 No.12804628 Report

Quoted By: >>12804719

>>12804599
>If SpaceX takes the lead, then it is righteously permitted to fuck up as much as it pleases..

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:16:56 No.12804635 Report

Quoted By:

SpaceX has some genius engineers, they'll fix this problem and any that may arise. Boeing fudders can go jerk off to thunderf00t videos.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:29:15 No.12804695 Report

Quoted By:

SpaceX has bum-crack engineers, they'll never fix this problem and use work-arounds. thunderf00t will capitalize on videos of consistent shit touchdowns causing breakage.
*thunderf00t has found his gravy train.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:35:05 No.12804719 Report

Quoted By: >>12804732

>>12804628
kind of lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:38:14 No.12804732 Report

Quoted By: >>12804746

>>12804719
IF no family is ever killed on starship, then musk is entitled to do whatever the fuck he wishes.
agreed?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:42:25 No.12804741 Report

Quoted By:

>>12801582
A Boing employee typed this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:44:51 No.12804746 Report

Quoted By: >>12804787

>>12804732
>sir will you disavow bad things
haha fud fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 08 Mar 2021 01:55:26 No.12804787 Report

Quoted By:

>>12804746
>I'm a bum-crack engineer, trust me.
>I meet my deadlines.
>"public-liability" is a different department, kek!!
>I'm a scientist, I can not do evil!!
>never heard of "insurance", loser!!
TRUSTing life to pathetic sad-shits like you is the problem.
keep sucking muskcock!!

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches