>>12794165>is a definitive answer ever possible"Right and wrong" are perceptual questions. So during questions of ambiguous perception, you can get any number of answers.
You could change the question to something more valid asking whether it has any utility/function. Then the answer becomes meaningful. The buddhist discovered early on the problem of perceptual ambiguity, especially related to moral qualms in life. They modified the moral question to work on the principles of function. Whether or not something is useful or not, in the buddhist case it was about usefulness to achieving enlightenment.
In the case of the duck/rabbit question, its somewhat useful in forcing people to think about the problems of ambiguity but doesn't prescribe an actual answer. The reason being most people accept the ambiguity in life without questioning why its even a thing, how it influences the life, etc. These aren't small things, the entire political discourse in the world is about ambiguity of perception and people taking various sides in the debate. Battle of ambiguous perception takes place in the hearts/minds of billions of people via various propaganda metrics. The goal is usually to paint your side as "clearly right" and other side as "clearly wrong."
For example, one side of says abortion/baby killers/prolife and other side says female rights/choice. They're both talking about the same thing event. Another recent example is covid. One side says "protect the life at all cost" other side says "protect the liberty at all cost." If you disagree with either side, you're a nazi/commie/racist/bootlicker/etc.
